Trends in the development of the foreign instrumental concerto at the turn of the 20th – the first quarter of the 21st century
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Statement of the problem. The instrumental concerto remains one of the most important genre spheres of composer’s interest at the turn of the 20th–beginning of the 21stcentury, which is confirmed by the wide palette of works written by artists of various national schools and directions. Among them are Philip Glass, Calevi Aho, Tan Dun, John Adams, Esa-Pekka Salonen, Einojuhani Rautavaara, Unsuk Chin, Dai Fujikura, Avner Dorman, Errollyn Wallen, Missy Mazzoli, Kaija Saariaho, Sampo Haapamäki, Ney Rosauro, Peter Mahajdik, Jukka Tiensuu, Li-Ying Wu and others. Different in their style, aesthetic level, compositional principles and performance techniques, the latest works in different ways reflect the modern stage of the development of the instrumental concert, and raise the natural question of what exactly unites them. Objectives, methods, and novelty of the research. Recent research and publications has shown that current studies of the concerto of the late 20th and early 21st centuries mainly focus on the work of one artist, a national school – Ukrainian (N. Zymohliad, K. Slipchenko), Spanish (F. J. T. Ruiz), Polish (A. Nowak), on a specific instrument, such as the oboe (V. Martynova), the piano (N. Zymohliad, A. Nowak), the bayan and the accordion (O. Vasylenko), the domra (K. Slipchenko), or on the concerto for orchestra (Ruiz, 2023). In spite of some important observations about the soloist’s “modern virtuosity” (A. Nowak), “genre interaction” (K. Slipchenko), compositional “reduction” (N. Zymohliad), attempts to identify the general trends in the development of the foreign concert at the turn of the 20th – early 21st century have not yet been carried out, which determines the novelty of the chosen research topic. Its purpose is to identify common features of foreign instrumental concerts of the late 20th and the first quarter of the 21st centuries, on the basis of which the key trends in its development at the current stage will be highlighted. In accordance with the objective, the following research methods were chosen: historical; structural and functional; comparative one. Research results and conclusion. The analysis showed that in the field of instrumental concert the trends declared in the 20th century continue to develop, in particular, the mixing of stylistic elements, interaction with distant genre models, the weakening of the principle of sonata and the role of the sonata form or its displacement by other structures. At the same time, a number of recent phenomena that arose in the 20th century, but mostly did not before spread to the instrumental concert genre, are observed, in particular: the expansion of the range of instruments that can be used as soloists (turning to ethnic instruments, involving species or several representatives of the group within the framework of one work, invention of instruments, and its structural modification); diversification of the timbre-expressive and virtuosic palette of the soloist due to the arsenal of extended performance techniques; and hence the new virtuosity of the soloist.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».