The Effectiveness of Islamic Therapeutic Spirituality with SIT on Emotional Dysfunction and Pain Self-Efficacy in Gastric Cancer Patients of Ardabil, Iran, in 2022
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background & aim: Stomach cancer is the fourth most common cancer in the world and the second cause of cancer death. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to determine and compare the effectiveness of Islamic therapeutic spirituality with SIT on emotional dysfunction and pain self-efficacy in gastric cancer patients of Ardabi, Iran. Methods: The present study was semi-experimental using the pre-test-post-test method with a control group, which was conducted in 2022. The statistical population included patients with stomach cancer in Ardabil city, Imam Khomeini Hospital and Shafa Parto Chemotherapy Center in Ardabil city in chemotherapy stage. 60 people were selected as available and were randomly divided into three groups (two experimental groups and one control group). The measurement tool in this research was the Toronto Emotional Dysfunction Scale, the Bandura Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. which was examined in three groups before the group intervention and at the end of the 10th session. The first test group was exposed to Islamic spiritual therapy, and the second test group was exposed to cognitive-behavioral therapy based on immunization training. received SIT and the control group did not receive any psychological treatment. The collected data were analyzed using statistical tests of covariance and its assumptions (Kalmogorov Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilks test and Levin test), post hoc Bonferroni test. Results: The results of multivariate covariance analysis indicated that the spirituality of Islamic therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy based on stress immunity training (SIT), both on emotional dysfunction and pain self-efficacy have a significant effectiveness compared to the control group, but the spiritual method of Islamic therapy compared to the cognitive-behavioral therapy group Re is based on immunization training in emotional failure (F=11.058) and pain self-efficacy (F=32.050), the effect of trust (P≤0.01). Conclusion: Considering the available findings, it seemed that SIT, despite emphasizing irrational thoughts, replacing them with efficient cognitions, and equipping the patient with a complete treasure of skills was less effective than Islamic therapeutic spirituality in reducing negative thoughts in stomach cancer patients. Therefore, these psychological interventions can be important and have clinical applications as an independent or complementary approach along with drug treatments in gastric cancer patients. Therefore, it is possible to take practical action by teaching Islamic spiritual therapy to improve their emotional inadequacy and self-efficacy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».