MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4401891826 · doi:10.1002/iir.1544

The European Insolvency Regulation and Implementing Legislations—A Commentary, 1st edition. By GillesCuniberti and AntonioLeandro, Cheltenham: Elgar. 2024. pp. xlix +718. £265. <scp>ISBN:</scp> 978‐1‐80220‐520‐6.

2024· article· en· W4401891826 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Eugenio Vaccari

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Insolvency Review · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueCorporate Insolvency and Governance
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésInsolvencyCitationLibrary sciencePolitical scienceLaw and economicsLawSociologyComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The European Insolvency Regulation and Implementing Legislations—A Commentary, edited by Gilles Cuniberti and Antonio Leandro, is an authoritative and comprehensive analysis of the European Insolvency Regulation (EIR) Recast 2015/848. Published by Edward Elgar Publishing in 2024, this book is part of the Elgar Commentaries in Private International Law series. It is written by a diverse group of established academics predominantly from Italian universities, along with contributions from professionals and one judge. This mix of contributors ensures a rich and multifaceted exploration of the EIR and its practical implications. The Introduction, penned by Antonio Leandro, provides a historical context that is crucial for understanding the evolution of European insolvency law. Leandro outlines the journey from the adoption of the initial European Insolvency Regulation 1346/2000 to the enactment of the Recast Regulation in 2015. This historical overview effectively explains why cross-border insolvencies necessitated a Community-wide approach, addressing private international law issues, such as choice of law and forum. The Introduction successfully highlights the necessity of group provisions and more efficient secondary proceeding mechanisms, which were key enhancements in the recast version. However, it could have offered a more detailed rationale behind the specific amendments in the 2015 Recast. The brief mentions the UK's withdrawal from the EU and its implications on the EIR Recast, along with the complementary nature of the Brussels I-bis Regulation, provide a well-rounded introductory framework for readers. The commentary is methodically divided into seven chapters, mirroring the structure of the EIR Recast. These chapters often begin with succinct introductions that set the stage for the detailed analyses that follow. Chapter I, which deals with general provisions, is particularly noteworthy for its thoroughness. Each article of the EIR Recast is presented verbatim before being dissected. For example, the analysis of Article 1 compares the 2000 and 2015 versions, contextualized with relevant recitals and practical examples from national laws, such as French law. This approach not only clarifies the scope of the regulation but also highlights what is included and excluded, referencing the proceedings listed in Annex A of the EIR Recast. The commentary is enriched with footnotes citing academic papers and EU case law, providing a robust academic foundation. Article 2, which addresses main definitions, is another highlight, particularly its focus on the localization of assets, illustrated through key case law like Nortel Networks ECLI:EU:C:2015:384. Article 3, concerning the notion of the centre of main interest (COMI), is a critical part of the book. Unsurprisingly, this has been authored by one of the editors. This section delves deeply into the evidence required to establish COMI in a specific jurisdiction and addresses complexities related to groups of companies and forum shopping practices. Article 7, covering applicable law, is introduced with an explanation of the preference for lex fori concursus and the issues that arise at different stages of insolvency procedures. The section on third-party rights in rem (Article 8) is meticulously detailed, concluding with a critical assessment and suggestions for a new regime for recognizing rights in rem and privileges in relation to assets in other countries. Chapter II addresses the recognition of insolvency proceedings and does an exemplary job explaining the simplified regime for recognizing foreign judgments, including those not issued by judicial bodies. The section on Article 19, outlining the general principle for recognition, clarifies the scope of this regime and its implications for scholars and practitioners outside the EU. This section highlights that recognition does not necessarily entail enforcement of a foreign judgment, an important distinction. Articles 20 and 24, focusing on the effects of recognition and the establishment of insolvency registers, respectively, are also covered comprehensively. The detailed analyses of Articles 25–30 and other key provisions such as the recognition and enforcement of judgments (Article 32) and the public policy exception (Article 33) underscore the importance of a consistent and restrictive interpretation of such exceptions, supported by extensive case law and literature. Chapter V, dedicated to group insolvencies, explores the new mechanisms for procedural consolidation of proceedings involving group companies. The chapter is divided into sections on cooperation and communication, and coordination. The latter section provides clear distinctions between procedural coordination and general provisions applicable to coordination. Despite the limited case law in this area, the commentary effectively references other academic publications to provide a thorough understanding of the topics covered in the provisions of the EIR Recast. Compared to other commentaries, the language used in this book is notably accessible, making it suitable for a wide audience. The detailed footnotes offer a wealth of references to external authoritative sources, serving as a starting point for further research. This commentary is a valuable resource for both academics and professionals, within and outside the EU, offering insights that cater to those with an in-depth understanding of the topic as well as newcomers. For academic purposes, this commentary is an essential addition to libraries offering master's level courses or research programs on European insolvency law. Its detailed analysis may be too advanced for undergraduate courses but is ideal for graduate-level study and professional reference. Overall, this work is a significant contribution to the field, providing clarity and depth on a complex and evolving area of law.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,066
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,130

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,012
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,006
Communication savante0,0090,006
Science ouverte0,0030,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0220,012
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0140,008

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,247
Écart entre enseignants0,231 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational Insolvency ReviewMême sujetCorporate Insolvency and GovernanceTravaux en français237 207