Intraventricular Pressure Difference by Blood Speckle Tracking - Invasive Validation and Clinical Application
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Early diastolic relaxation creates an intraventricular pressure difference (IVPD) and resulting diastolic suction. Non-invasive estimation by echocardiographic techniques would allow to clinically evaluate this IVPD as an important component of ventricular filling. Recently, Blood Speckle Tracking (BST) echocardiography was introduced, allowing two-dimensional assessment of ventricular flow dynamics. Mitral inflow BST data can be used to estimate IVPD. The aims of the current study were to evaluate the accuracy of BST-based IVPD estimation compared to invasive pressure measurements in an in vivo animal model, and to clinically apply the method by comparing IVPD in children with univentricular hearts (UVH) and healthy controls. Methods The accuracy of BST-based IVPD-estimates was assessed in an open-chest porcine model, comparing BST-based IVPD with simultaneous repeated invasive pressure measurements in six pigs using micromanometer catheters. BST-based IVPD assessment was performed in 120 healthy controls and 44 patients with UVH < 18 years of age. Total IVPD (from base to apex) and apical IVPD (from the apical 2/3 of the ventricle) during early diastolic filling of the systemic ventricle was compared between patients with UVH and healthy controls. Results The validation in pigs included 103 measurements, demonstrating a mean difference of - 0.01mmHg (p=0.33) and high correlation (r = 0.95, p-value < 0.001) between IVPD from BST (-1.31 ± 0.28 mmHg) and invasive measurements (-1.30 ± 0.31 mmHg). In the pediatric patients, age range 2 days-17.76 years, feasibility was 96% in controls and 88.6% in UVH patients. Total and apical IVPD were significantly higher in controls compared to UVH (-1.82 vs -0.88 mmHg and -0.63 vs -0.33 mmHg, p < 0.001). Variability was low with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.99/0.96 (interobserver) and 0.98/0.99 (intraobserver) for total and apical IVPD respectively. Conclusions BST echocardiography provides accurate estimation of early diastolic IVPD. When clinically applied in children, we found high feasibility and reproducibility. IVPD was significantly lower in children with UVH compared to controls suggesting lower diastolic suction which can impact overall filling dynamics. Clinical perspective What is new Blood speckle tracking echocardiography provides non-invasive estimation of intraventricular pressure difference in early diastole using two-dimensional blood flow velocities Intraventricular pressure difference based on blood speckle tracking is highly feasible, accurate and reproducible Blood speckle tracking demonstrates significantly reduced intraventricular pressure difference in early diastole in children with univentricular hearts indicating impaired relaxation and suction in these patients What are the clinical implications Intraventricular pressure difference based on blood speckle tracking is a novel and potential sensitive echocardiographic parameter to describe early diastolic ventricular relaxation and diastolic function in children with univentricular hearts Blood speckle tracking could improve assessment of diastolic function in children with congenital heart disease Non-invasive estimation of intraventricular pressure difference based on blood speckle tracking could improve assessment of diastolic function both in children and adults with heart disease
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».