P31 Young people’s sexual wellbeing: developing a conceptual model using qualitative methods
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
<h3>Background</h3> Adolescence is usually a period of normal and healthy sexuality development marked by experimentation and identity formation, but can also involve challenging experiences, particularly for sexual/gender minoritised young people. The concept of sexual wellbeing is useful in clarifying the links between sexuality and mental wellbeing, recognising that psychosocial issues like shame, stigma and trauma affect both sexuality and mental health. Sexual wellbeing demands focus beyond skills and competences to prevent risk of STIs and unintended pregnancy. Our conceptual model of young people’s sexual wellbeing takes a developmental perspective based on an existing model for adults which defines sexual wellbeing as <i>‘feeling safe, secure, respected, comfortable, and confident in relation to sexuality, and able to work through change, challenges, and negative past experiences’.</i> It recognises that sexual wellbeing is influenced by environments, including family, peers, education, the health system, laws, and cultural values. <h3>Methods</h3> We conducted seven agenda-setting workshops with 28 young people aged 14 to 23 (mix of genders and sexual identities); 4 parents/carers; and 11 mental health researchers/practitioners. These workshops helped identify priority topics on links between adolescent sexuality and mental health. In March/April 2024 we will conduct six model-building workshops and 10 cognitive interviews with young people aged 14 to 19 years, to develop and refine a conceptual model and draft items for a corresponding measure. <h3>Results</h3> Agenda-setting workshops highlighted the following priorities among young people aged 14-23: body confidence; sexual pressures and expectations; confidence in own identities; access to community support; sexual shame; emotional impacts of first/previous experiences; expressing desires; and establishing boundaries. Our planned model-building workshops will uncover young people’s descriptions of ‘feeling good/feeling bad’ in the context of common developmental sexual experiences (e.g., from puberty, to exploring identity, learning about sex, exploratory activities, intended and unintended exposures to sexual content). Discussions will be structured around domains from an existing conceptual model for adults (rights and respect; self-esteem; comfort; safety; autonomy; self-efficacy; resources for support). In the final three workshops, we will co-produce a long-list of measure items to assess key issues. Ten cognitive interviews will probe comprehension, acceptability and appropriateness of terminology. We will present the draft model and highlight exemplar items. <h3>Conclusion</h3> The conceptual model and corresponding tools emerging from this integrated work with groups of young people is expected to contribute to a meaningful and dramatic shift in the ways that we understand sexual wellbeing, respectful of the many complexities that adolescents’ lives represent.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,039 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».