MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4401920034 · doi:10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1698

Myasthenia Gravis presenting as a Dissociative Disorder: a case report of a differential diagnosis

2024· article· en· W4401920034 sur OpenAlexaff
A. P. Laizāne, A. Blekte, A. Bērziņa

Notice bibliographique

RevueEuropean Psychiatry · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMyasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
Établissements canadiensCegep de Saint Hyacinthe
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMyasthenia gravisDifferential diagnosisDissociativeMedicineDifferential (mechanical device)PsychiatryPathologyPhysics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction Conversion disorder is characterised by symptoms that can impact sensory or motor function. The average incidence of conversion disorder is between 4 -12 per 100,000 per year. Conversion disorder has a wide variety of somatic and neurological differential diagnoses. Objectives A 22-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital due to COVID-19 pneumonia. During the hospitalisation period, she developed progressive weakness, due to which she couldn’t move, eat or take care of herself. In terms of history, she is healthy, married and gave birth to her first child almost 9 months ago. Two days postpartum, the patient experienced an inability to connect with the child and provide care, as well as a decline in her mood. The husband reports episodes in which the patient had difficulties holding the child while being able to perform house chores, which required more physical strength. Two years prior to hospitalization, during stressful situations she experienced similar episodes and difficulty swallowing. While hospitalized, extensive testing was done, including an acetylcholine receptor antibody test, which was negative at first. Because of of the initially negative testing results a psychiatrist was called. On the first visit, the patient remained in a supine position and reported a lack of strength in both arms and legs, occasionally experiencing difficulty raising her head, however managed to stand up from the bed, walk independently for 5–6 meters, turn around, and, as soon as she reached the bed, descend into it. The staff reported her inability to walk earlier in the day. On the second visit, she notes that she feels tired but now can feed and take care of herself; however, some weakness persists in the proximal muscle groups. In between visits she received treatment with corticosteroids because of the COVID infection. After repeating the acetylcholine receptor antibody test, there was a positive result, and a diagnosis was established. Methods This case report demonstrates how a somatic disorder can mimic a psychiatric one because of the overlapping symptoms and initial negative test results. While receiving symptomatic therapy with glucocorticoids due to the COVID infection, the patient’s condition improved; she began to eat and walk on her own. Results From the psychiatric aspect, it was associated with separation from the child— a relieving of the stress factor, due to which dissociative symptoms decreased. Conclusions Before considering a diagnosis of a dissociative disorder, a patient should be examined by other specialists according to their symptoms. A thorough neurologic and physical examination, as well as diagnostic tests, should be performed to exclude a physical pathology. Myasthenia gravis has a comorbidity with a number of psychiatric conditions and can also be very similar to a dissociative disorder, especially due to stress aggravating the symptoms of myasthenia gravis. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,210
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,874

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,285
Écart entre enseignants0,275 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEuropean PsychiatryMême sujetMyasthenia Gravis and ThymomaTravaux en français237 207