MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4402112957 · doi:10.1542/gr.52-3-28

A Breakthrough in Treatment for Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia

2024· article· en· W4402112957 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueAAP Grand Rounds · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueSexual Differentiation and Disorders
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineCongenital adrenal hyperplasiaHyperplasiaInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Source: Sarafoglou K , Kim MS , Lodish M , et al . Phase 3 trial of crinecerfont in pediatric congenital adrenal hyperplasia [published online ahead of print June 2, 2024]. N Engl J Med. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2404655.Investigators from multiple institutions conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of crinecerfont, a corticotropin-releasing factor type 1 receptor antagonist, for treatment of children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH). Participants were patients 2–17 years old with CAH who were receiving glucocorticoid doses >12 mg/m2/day (hydrocortisone dose equivalent) and had 17-hydroxyprogesterone levels >2 times higher than the upper limit of normal. Study children were enrolled at 37 centers in the US, Canada, and Europe and were randomized 2:1 to receive crinecerfont, 25 to 100 mg twice daily, or placebo for 28 weeks. Androstenedione and 17-hydroxyprogesterone levels were monitored throughout the trial. During the first 4 weeks of treatment, glucocorticoid doses remained stable in participants. Following this, glucocorticoid doses were adjusted in a stepwise fashion to a target of 8–10 mg/m2/day, provided that the androstenedione level was not >120% of baseline level or no higher than the upper limit of normal. The primary study outcome was change in androstenedione level from baseline to week 4. Secondary outcomes included percent change in glucocorticoid dose from baseline to week 28 and change in 17-hydroxyprogesterone level from baseline to week 4. Differences between children in the 2 treatment groups were assessed using analysis of covariance models. In addition, adverse events were assessed throughout the trail.A total of 103 children were enrolled in the study, and 100 continued in the trial through week 28, including 69 who received crinecerfont and 31 randomized to placebo. The mean age of study participants was 12.1 ±1.5 years, and mean glucocorticoid dose was 16.4 ±3.9 mg/m2/day. From baseline to week 4, the mean androstenedione level decreased by 197 ±39 ng/dL for children randomized to crinecerfont and increased by 71 ±56 ng/dL for those randomized to placebo (P <0.001). Similarly, the mean changes in 17-hydroxyprogesterone levels during this period were -5,865 ±572 ng/dL and 556 ±818 ng/dL, respectively, for participants assigned to crinecerfont or placebo treatment (P <0.001). At week 28, the mean glucocorticoid dose was 12.8 mg/m2/day for patients randomized to crinecerfort and 17.0 mg/m2/ day for those receiving placebo. The mean changes in glucocortoid dose from baseline to week 28 were -18% and 5.6%, respectively, for children receiving crinecerfont or placebo (P <0.001). At least 1 adverse event was reported in 84% of patients randomized to crinecerfont and 82% of those receiving placebo. Two patients in the crinecerfont group were withdrawn from the study because of symptoms including nausea, upper abdominal pain, and retching.The authors conclude that crinecerfont treatment for children with CAH was associated with a decrease in the glucocorticoid dose required to maintain control of androstenedione.Dr Goyal has disclosed no financial relationship relevant to this commentary. This commentary does not contain a discussion of an unapproved/investigative use of a commercial product/device.CAH is estimated to affect about 1 per 15,000 newborns.1 Over 90% of CAH cases are caused by a defect in the 21-OH gene (CYP21), resulting in a deficiency in 21-hydroxylase, which leads to impaired synthesis of cortisol and often aldosterone. Newborn screening for CAH is mandatory in all US states and is effective for early identification to prevent infant mortality and morbidity associated with salt-wasting.2,3 The current mainstay of treatment is hydrocortisone, typically three times daily due to its short half-life, often at supraphysiologic doses that increase the risk of side effects including growth suppression, weight gain, and insulin resistance.3 As a result, clinical management is challenging, and even with frequent monitoring for both over-and under-treatment, children with CAH often face lifelong impaired metabolic and reproductive health.The current study investigated crinecerfont, a corticotropin-releasing factor type 1 receptor antagonist, for treatment of children with CAH. Interestingly, findings from this study revealed the inadequacy of current treatment paradigms for CAH, as children in the study had high baseline rates of both obesity and androgen excess. Treatment with crinecerfont was associated with significant reductions in androstenedione and 17-hydroxyprogesterone levels. Children in the crinecerfort treatment arm were able to receive lower doses of glucocorticoid, with a commensurate decrease in glucocorticoid side effects including insulin resistance.These results support crinecerfont as a safe and effective option that likely will soon receive FDA approval as the first non-glucocorticoid treatment of children with CAH. Further research will be needed to demonstrate the impact for younger children and to measure longer-term outcomes, including bone age and linear growth. Still, results from this rigorously designed study warrant initial enthusiasm for a breakthrough for this rare, but serious, condition.Crinecerfont is a new non-glucocorticoid treatment that may improve care of children with CAH.Gene therapy for CAH, a monogenic disease exemplar, using an adenoviral vector to deliver functional copies of the CYP21A2 gene, is currently being explored in US adult patients (see ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04783181).4

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,863
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,342

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,300
Écart entre enseignants0,281 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAAP Grand RoundsMême sujetSexual Differentiation and DisordersTravaux en français237 207