Cardiovascular Contributors to Cognitive Impairment Among People Living With HIV Age 40 Years and Older in Kazakhstan
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Kazakh population has been increasing in age over the last two decades. Life expectancy in Kazakhstan in 2022 was 73.8 years (y). Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) accounted for ∼84% of deaths, particularly among men, and included cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease and cancer. It is anticipated that life expectancy trends will be similar among People Living With HIV (PLWH) who are virally suppressed in Kazakhstan. However, the prevalence and types of aging-related NCDs among Kazakh PLWH are unknown, despite ∼40% of Kazakh PLWH being age >40 years (y). In addition, and limited knowledge exists about the NCD-HIV care continuum. An ongoing cross-sectional study is being conducted among PLWH, >40y at the Almaty AIDS center. Cardiovascular, clinical, sociodemographic, mental health, medical history, health behavior, and HIV measures are collected. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment was included (range: 0-30). 113 PLWH were interviewed over ∼6 months (43.4% females; 54.9% age 40-49y, 30.1%, 11.5% and 3.5% age 50-59, 60-69, >70 years, respectively; gender: 58.3% cis men, 41.7% cis women; 20.4% self-reported Asian (Kazakh) race, 56.6% White (Russian), 23.0% unknown; 55.4% were employed; 25.7% reported education beyond college; 65.5% consumed alcohol; 76.1% were current smokers and 26.5% drug users. 54% had healthy BMI (18.5- <25 kg/m2). Systolic blood pressure range was 90-140mmHg (median 120); diastolic blood pressure range, 60-100mmHg (median 80). Median oxygen saturation was 98%. 76.7% participants had undetectable HIV viral load (<50 copies/ml), and 16.7% exhibited CD4 cell count <200 cells/mm3. However, 36.3% had high NT-pro-BNP (≥125 pg/ml), which was accompanied by a higher mean HIV viral load (p=0.026). Mean plasma glucose (mmol/l) and triglycerides were higher (p<0.10) among those with NT- proBNP ≥125 pg/ml. Among those taking antiretroviral therapies over a longer time period, there was higher NT-proBNP, however p>0.05. The MoCA indicated that 61.9% scored <26 (raw score); average 23.1. Comparing those with MoCA <26 versus ≥26, there were no differences in pro-BNP or lipid levels, HIV viral load or CD4+ count. However, diastolic blood pressure was higher among those with MoCA<26 (p=0.043). Further investigation to understand cardiovascular contributors to cognitive impairment among PLWH is necessary.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».