MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4402169893 · doi:10.32920/26883781

Stochastic-Based Hyperparameter Selection and Learnability Analysis in Supervised and Unsupervised Learning

2024· preprint· en· W4402169893 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typepreprint
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueMachine Learning and Data Classification
Établissements canadiensToronto Metropolitan University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLearnabilityHyperparameterMachine learningArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceSelection (genetic algorithm)Statistical learningUnsupervised learningSupervised learningArtificial neural network

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

<p>The goal of a learning algorithm is to receive a training data set as input and provide a hypothesis that can generalize to all possible data points from a domain set. The hypothesis is chosen from hypothesis classes with potentially different complexity orders that represent controlling parameters in the learning process, also denoted as hyperparameters. Linear regression modeling is an important category of learning algorithms. Uncertainty of target samples in practical applications affects the generalization performance of the learned model. Failing to choose a proper model or hypothesis class can lead to serious issues such as underfitting or overfitting. These issues have been addressed by alternating cost functions or by utilizing cross-validation methods. These approaches can introduce new hyperparameters with their own new challenges and uncertainties or increase the computational complexity of the learning algorithm. On the other hand, the theory of probably approximately correct (PAC) aims at defining learnability based on probabilistic settings. Despite its theoretical value, PAC does not address practical learning issues on many occasions. This thesis is inspired by the foundation of PAC and is motivated by existing regression learning issues. The proposed approach, denoted by ε-Confidence Approximately Correct (ε-CoAC), utilizes Kullback—Leibler divergence (relative entropy) and proposes a new related typical set in the set of hyperparameters to tackle the learnability issue. ε-CoAC learnability is able to validate the learning process as a function of data length and as a function of the complexity order of the hypothesis class. Moreover, it enables the learner to compare hypothesis classes of different complexity order (hyperparameters) and choose among them the optimum with the minimum ε in the ε-CoAC framework. The ε-CoAC learnability not only overcomes the issues of overfitting and underfitting, but also shows advantages and superiority over the well-known cross-validation method in terms of time consumption and in terms of accuracy. A valuable application of ε-CoAC learnability is presented for simultaneous model order and time delay selection for LTI systems. Classical methods have approached this problem from two separate angles for time-delay estimation and for order selection with different cost functions. The ε-CoAC approach solves the problem with a unified cost function. The proposed method not only outperforms existing approaches but is also shown to be more robust to variations of the signal to noise ratio (SNR). The approach is also extended for online impulse response estimation and introduces efficient stopping criteria that are extremely valuable in practical applications. For the second hyperparameter analysis in machine learning, the challenge of regularization hyperparameter selection for the Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm is addressed. The regularization parameter controls the model capacity and the trade-off between the training and the generalization errors. It is shown that interestingly the introduced Separability and Scatteredness (S&S) ratio plays a key role in SVM hyperparameter selection, including kernel hyperparameters. Importance of S&S ratio in this context is similar to the role of the signal-to-noise ratio in the signal processing context. The proposed method outperforms existing cross-validation approaches, especially in the sense of computational complexity. For the hyperparameter selection in unsupervised learning, the fundamentals of ε-CoAC learnability is utilized by viewing the problem of clustering from a new angle. The application of the proposed stochastic based hyperparameter selecting algorithm can be generalized in the form of a validity index. The new validity index is shown to be superior to the state-of-the-art validity indices in the sense of accuracy and robustness to the cluster shape. Finally, the proposed validation index approach is extended for application in graph node clustering. The approach shows advantages over the existing methods in the sense of conductance and graph-based normalizing cuts.</p>

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,439
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,268
Écart entre enseignants0,251 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetMachine Learning and Data ClassificationTravaux en français237 207