Understanding Asymmetrical Opposition to Medical Assistance in Dying for Mental Illness
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In Canada medical assistance in dying (MAiD) excludes individuals who have a mental health disorder as their sole underlying medical condition (MD-SUMC).This suggests mental illness is conceptually distinct from somatic illness, a position that requires further analysis.The Canadian government has postponed legislation on mental health conditions since it is highly controversial compared to physical illness, and this will allow them to collect more data on the issue (Government of Canada 2024a).Aside from the legislative reality in Canada, Jeffrey Kirby (2022) has described three positions that scholars have taken up regrading the ethical permissibility of MAiD for MD-SUMC: (a) accept that MAiD for MD-SUMC is ethically permissible; (b) presently oppose MAiD for MD-SUMC, but maintain that MAiD for MD-SUMC could become ethically permissible should the current eligibility criteria better align with the relevant empirical data; and (c) oppose MAiD for MD-SUMC on "philosophical grounds" and maintain that no alteration could make the practice ethically permissible.If we assume that each view described by Kirby also entails the claim that MAiD in general is ethically permissible, or at the very least is not ethically impermissible, it appears that opposition to MAiD for MD-SUMC reveals something important about the way in which mental illness is understood-namely, as something perhaps categorically different from somatic illness.This results from the asymmetry between holding that MAiD for somatic illness is ethically permissible, but MAiD for MD-SUMC is ethically impermissible.At present there are five conditions that must be met in order for one to be eligible for MAiD: (1) be eligible for government-funded health services; (2) be competent and at least 18 years of age; (3) voluntarily request MAiD; (4) provide informed consent; and (5) have a grievous and irremediable medical condition (Government of Canada 2024b).To determine whether one's medical condition is grievous and irremediable, there are further conditions that must be met: (i) "have a serious illness, disease, or disability;" (ii) "be in an advanced state of decline that cannot be reversed;" and (iii) "experience unbearable physical or mental suffering from your illness, disease, disability or state of decline that cannot be relieved under conditions that you consider acceptable" (Government of Canada 2024b; emphasis in original).Emphasis tends to be placed on the grievous and irremediable nature of one's medical condition in debates on MAiD for MD-SUMC (Birkness and Rudnick 2023).For example,
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».