Risk Factor Analysis in Patients Exhibiting Cerebral Microbleeds and the Correlation with Cognitive Impairment
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Objective: To identify the risk factors contributing to cerebral microbleeds (CMBs), analyze the correlation between the quantity and distribution of CMBs and overall cognitive performance, including specific cognitive domains in patients, and investigate the underlying mechanisms by which CMBs impact cognitive function. Methods: Patients diagnosed with cerebral small vessel disease were recruited between September 2022 and September 2023. Clinical baseline data were systematically gathered. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was employed to evaluate patients’ cognitive status. CMBs were identified via susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), noting their locations and quantities. Patients were categorized into two cohorts: those without CMBs and those with CMBs. This division facilitated the comparison of basic clinical data and laboratory indicators, aiming to elucidate the risk factors associated with CMBs. Within the CMBs cohort, patients were further classified based on the number of CMBs into mild, moderate, and severe groups, and according to CMBs’ locations into deep, cortical-subcortical, and mixed groups. Spearman correlation analysis and ANOVA were utilized to compare the total MoCA scores, as well as scores in specific cognitive domains, across these groups. This approach enabled the analysis of the relationship between the quantity and location of CMBs and cognitive impairment. Results: Statistically significant differences were noted between patients with and without cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) regarding gender, age, hypertension, diabetes, history of cerebral infarction, history of alcohol consumption, glycosylated hemoglobin levels, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and homocysteine levels ( p < .05). Multifactorial logistic regression analysis identified age, hypertension, diabetes, history of alcohol consumption, and elevated homocysteine as independent risk factors for the development of CMBs. Spearman correlation analysis revealed a linear correlation between the presence of CMBs and the total score of the MoCA ( r = −.837, p < .001). The group with CMBs demonstrated a significant decline in visuospatial execution function and delayed recall abilities compared to the group without CMBs ( p < .05). Specifically, deep CMBs were linked to impairments in visuospatial execution function, naming, attention, computational ability, language, delayed recall, and orientation ( p < .05). Cortical-subcortical CMBs affected visuospatial execution function, attention, computational ability, and delayed recall ability( p < .05). Mixed CMBs impacted visuospatial execution function and naming ( p < .05). Conclusion: Age, hypertension, diabetes, history of alcohol consumption, and elevated homocysteine levels are key independent risk factors for CMBs. There exists a linear relationship between the severity of CMBs and the extent of cognitive impairment. Patients with CMBs show notable deterioration in visuospatial execution function and delayed recall abilities. Furthermore, the location of CMBs influences various specific cognitive domains.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».