Acoustic airway clearance devices: A systematic review of experimental and numerical studies
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
• Categorized 14 airway clearance devices according to their working principles. • Discussed existing hot technologies, inconsistencies, and gaps behind the devices. • Reviewed both experimental and numerical studies from 1958 to 2024 in this field. • Evaluated devices regarding the multidisciplinary nature of airway clearance. • Identified the current and future trends in airway clearance devices. The global respiratory care devices market, including acoustic airway clearance devices (ACDs), is expected to experience a compound annual growth rate of 6.10 % from 2023 to 2030. However, there are a number of inconsistencies in the categorization and working frequency range from one discipline to another one. A better understanding of the mechanisms of action of these devices is therefore of prime importance in order for physicians, physiotherapists, scientists, and engineers to remain abreast of up-to-date studies in the field and specifically on the frequency range used. In the present review, we have categorized acoustic ACDs according to their working principles while reviewing their existing shortcomings in both experimental and numerical studies, thereby paving the way for future research directions. A total of 14 different ACDs are discussed, taking into account their working principle and frequency range, and classified as follows: mechano-acoustic devices, high-frequency chest wall compression (HFCWC), and high-frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) for high-frequency chest compression (HFCC) and oral high-frequency oscillation (OHFO). Existing studies highlight that ACDs with HFCWC distinguish themselves from other devices by supplying compression in a homogeneous manner, allowing the delivery of both efficient and gentle therapy up to approximately 40 Hz. Notwithstanding, a stark difference in the working frequency range across the various devices was found and identified as a literature gap. Given that this difference arises from both experimental and numerical studies between the various disciplines, the studies are further classified according to their respective objectives, methodology and outputs to help readers quickly and straightforwardly locate the articles of interest for potential future investigations. The review also brings to light the interdisciplinary nature of ACDs, whereby numerical biomedical studies can actively assist experimental studies in terms of reproducibility and reliability, creating a digital twin of the human chest and its respective components.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle