MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4402421267 · doi:10.1111/cag.12949

Garden inventories: Reflections on land, place and belonging By MariamPirbhai, Hamilton: Wolsak & Wynn. 2023. 172 pages. $20.00 (paperback). ISBN: 9781989496770

2024· article· en· W4402421267 sur OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Lorelei L. Hanson

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueSoutheast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
Établissements canadiensAthabasca University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWynnHistoryPhilosophyLinguistics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In the first chapter of Braiding sweetgrass, Robin Wall Kimmerer (2013, p. 7) writes: “The work of living is creating a map for yourself.” She describes how in every era, and for each individual, the map will be different as it is informed by the stories we understand about ourselves. Kimmerer (2013, p. 9) further explains how in our current era “the land shows the bruises of an abusive relationship” and that healing these wounds cannot proceed without “restoration/re-story-ation.” To heal our relationships with the land, we will need to learn how to hear its stories. Garden inventories is a delightful account of Mariam Pirbhai's attempt to hear and read the stories of a new land and chart her life map. An immigrant to Canada from Pakistan via England, the United Arab Emirates, and the Philippines, Pirbhai explores what it means to become rooted or naturalized in a place. She explains that rootedness is a gradual process that grows in spaces we curate and create for ourselves and ideally it's shaped through interrelations with other human and more-than-human communities. Also, as émigré-settler, Pirbhai recognizes that her vision of her adopted land is “contrapuntal,” refracted through the multiple distinct landscapes where she has lived and developed a sense of belonging, as well as marked by the “historical ripples and echoes of colonization” (p. 5). Through investigating the gardens, lawns, summer homes, nurseries, and conservation areas of her past and present life in southern Ontario, Pirbhai leads the reader along transecting and lush paths to explore the layers of stories and meanings associated with particular terrains, plants, and recreational activities. Across seven chapters, she examines the form and contents of her own, her families’ and her neighbours’ home and cottage landscapes—and how they are representations of particular values and ideas that reinforce or diminish connections to the natural spaces beyond them and their indigenous inhabitants. The book blends history, memoir, and horticulture to create a playful meditation on cultural knowledge as depicted through revered vegetation and landscapes. As a gardener, I was fascinated by the sections that delve into the historical evolution of where plants are cultivated and the common names that are attached to them, by not only European settlers but also by Indigenous peoples across Turtle Island. Pirbhai applies her critical postcolonial sensibilities to these genealogical inquests into the names of flowers, shrubs, and trees to weave together clues about the merging of cultures and places, near and far, and to highlight how “deeply intwined are the worlds of racial and botanical nomenclature” (p. 117). Not a fan of the cultivated rose, I was still captivated by the historical journey of this coveted flowering bush from still unknown origins across the Persian plateau, the Indian subcontinent, and Moorish Spain to northern Europe and eventually the Americas. Pirbhai explains that while in some cases such horticultural trade supported mutually enriching exchanges and the friendly merging of cultures, in other instances these botanical trades were acts of conquest and transformed into markers of superiority. Perhaps the most striking feature of this small book is the elegant way in which Pirbhai integrates theorizing about decolonization, postcoloniality, and Indigenization into her personal discoveries of the provenance of various plants. For example, inspired by the flora they encounter on their daily walks along a nearby creek and woodlot, Pirbhai and her husband decide to replace many of the current plants in their yard with native species. Her observations of the plants in each space transform into clues in an investigation of the differences between naturalized, native, and invasive plants. A comparison of the aggressively suckering European buckthorn in their Waterloo (Ontario) yard with the tamarind tree, cherished from her childhood in Pakistan, reveals some important distinctions about settler status. While the couple find the buckthorn in the woodlot they traverse and hence assume the species to be native to the area, they later discover that it's an encroaching rapacious shrubby tree that crowds out other species, and therefore invasive. In contrast, Pirbhai conjectures that the tamarind tree, synonymous with the Indian subcontinent, is a naturalized species with African lineage. It's a nitrogen-fixing tree with leaves and bark that have medicinal properties, and it is coveted for its sticky sweet and sour fruit. Though common across India and Pakistan, the tamarind tree is a “good-natured transplant” able to “live in harmony with its native counterparts” (p. 115). Pirbhai concludes that non-native does not necessarily translate into invasive. Pirbhai's garden musings are lyrical, insightful, and inspiring. Written in a style accessible to most, I’ll recommend this book to my gardening friends. The book as whole, or chapters of it, could also be considered for inclusion on reading lists of courses in environmental studies, environmental humanities, human geography, and global studies. Pirbhai demonstrates how to hear the stories of the land, heal some of the bruises inflicted upon it, and embody reciprocity and respect as a new settler to it. She presents an expansive understanding of garden landscapes that gives the reader pause to carefully consider the land they call home and how they engage with it and its Indigenous inhabitants.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,433
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,006
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,005
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,266
Écart entre enseignants0,246 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennesMême sujetSoutheast Asian Sociopolitical StudiesTravaux en français237 207