227 Moderate body weight loss reduces total antioxidant capacity in pregnant beef heifers and one-carbon metabolite supplementation does not mitigate this response
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract In beef heifers, body weight (BW) gain and physiological stress are important considerations for reproductive outcomes and whole herd production efficiencies. The objective of this study was to determine if dietary one-carbon metabolite (OCM) supplementation in moderate BW loss pregnant heifers alters circulating total antioxidant capacity, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione peroxidase activity. In a replicated 2 × 2 factorial, Angus-cross heifers (n = 81) were stratified by BW to gain 0.45 kg/d (CON) or lose 0.23 kg/d (RES) and receive corn carrier with OCM supplements (+OCM) or without (−OCM). The OCM supplements consisted of vitamin B12 (20 mg) and folate (320 mg) injections weekly and dietary rumen-protected methionine (7.4 g/d) and choline (44.4 g/d) from breeding (d 0) to d 63 of gestation. The four treatment groups were: CON−OCM (n = 20), CON+OCM (n = 21), RES−OCM (n = 21), and RES+OCM (n = 19). Heifers underwent estrus synchronization and were bred via artificial insemination using female sexed semen to a single sire. Pregnancy was diagnosed and fetal sex was verified on d 35 of gestation. Blood was collected and assayed for total antioxidant capacity, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione peroxidase activity on d −2 (baseline), 35, and 63 of gestation for all three replicates. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS with repeated measures to determine the effect of gain, supplement, day, and their two-way and three-way interactions. The gain × supplement interaction remained in all models, but other interactions were removed if P > 0.10. Replicate and heifer BW were included in the model as covariates and covariance structure was determined by lowest AIC and BIC. Statistical significance was considered at P ≤ 0.05 and tendencies at 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10. There was no BW gain × supplement interaction, or main effect of OCM supplements in total antioxidants. There was a gain × day effect (P ≤ 0.01), in which total antioxidants were increased on d 35 and further increased on d 63 in CON compared with RES treatments. There was no gain × supplement interaction, or main effect of gain or OCM supplements in superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase. However, both superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase were decreased (P ≤ 0.01) on d 63 compared with d 0 and 35. These data suggest that moderate BW loss reduces total antioxidant capacity in pregnant beef heifers, which could affect redox homeostasis. However, OCM supplements did not affect total antioxidant capacity, superoxide dismutase, or glutathione peroxidase. These findings are somewhat surprising considering oxidative stress has been well characterized in nutrient-restricted pregnancies, and given the interconnection between energy metabolism and one-carbon metabolism. Future research is warranted to fully elucidate the therapeutic effects of one-carbon metabolites.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».