299 Impact of antimicrobial bathing on canine dermal microbiota regrowth
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Recent public health concerns have heightened concerns regarding the potential for contact transfer of bacteria from dogs to humans. Pathogenic bacteria including strains of Staphylococcus are of specific concern and have raised the question regarding the use of antimicrobial based bathing methods for potential mitigation. Common veterinary antimicrobial cleansers such as chlorhexidine gluconate have been suggested as possible decontamination cleansers. Chlorhexidine gluconate bathing has been well studied in humans. However, its use beyond surgical preparation is not well examined in canines. Therefore, the objective of this work was to identify the time frame associated with dermal microbial regrowth following an antimicrobial bath designed to mimic a decontamination procedure using chlorhexidine gluconate. Labrador Retrievers (n = 10) were assigned to treatment group (control = CON; chlorhexidine gluconate = CHX) and were bathed by a single trained technician using either water (CON) or chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX). Baths included the application of 280 mL of treatment (CON = water; CHX = 4% chlorhexidine diluted 1:4). Three dermal swabs were collected at the shoulder blades at baseline (prior to bathing) and across the following timepoints after the bathing procedure: 1 h, 12 h, 24 h, 36 h, and 48 h. Swab solutions were diluted to 108. All dilutions were plated on nutrient agar and incubated at 30° C for 44 to 50 h. Colony counts were measured to calculate final cells/mL concentration of samples. Mean concentration per timepoint for each canine was used for analysis using SAS on Demand with significance determined at P = 0.05. Mean concentration values over time compared with baseline were analyzed for effects of time, treatment group, and sex via PROC GLM between by within ANOVA. Time following bathing, treatment and sex significantly impacted bacterial regrowth (P < 0.0001). Bacterial growth did not differ significantly until 24 h following bathing at which point the CON group regrowth began. Dogs in the CHX group had reduced regrowth through the 48 h following bathing and failed to completely recover by 48 h post bathing. Males had increased regrowth compared with females in both CHX and CON groups. These results indicate a surprising time delay associated with antimicrobial bathing. The antimicrobial effect of chlorhexidine gluconate was not fully evident until 24 h and had differing impacts based on sex in the studied canines. Future studies should examine these findings in larger research cohorts with different breeds to identify impacts associated with coat type, sex, and more frequent sampling intervals.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».