PSLBI-13 Characterizing the seminal microbiota in mature rams managed on divergent planes of nutrition, and in their male offspring
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Increasing evidence suggests that the bovine semen harbors commensal microbiota, and it may be important in male fertility. However, much is unknown regarding the seminal microbiota, its evolution and factors shaping this community in sheep. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether managing the rams on divergent planes of nutrition can influence the seminal microbiota in mature rams and their male offspring. For this, Rambouillet rams (n = 24; 1.5 to 4 yr old) were randomly assigned to one of three groups: 1) a positive plane of nutrition [target 12% gain in their initial body weight (BW; POS, n = 8); 2) a maintenance [maintain the initial BW (MNT, n = 8)]; and 3) a negative [target a 12% reduction in BW (NEG; n = 8)] plane of nutrition over 84 d. The rams were individually housed and fed a common diet, and feed allocations were adjusted weekly. Following the 84-d feeding period, these rams were used to breed 240 mature Rambouillet ewes (1:10 ram:ewe ratio) over 28 d of breeding. After lambing, the male lambs were maintained on a similar diet for 124 d. Semen samples from the mature rams (F0 generation) were collected on d 28, 56, and 84, and semen samples from offspring rams (F1 generation) were collected at 330 d of age via electroejaculation. Genomic DNA was extracted from semen samples and the seminal microbiota characterized using 16S rRNA gene (V3-V4) sequencing. Several environmental and negative extraction controls were also sequenced to assess potential contaminants in these samples. Overall community structure of the seminal microbiota in F0 rams was not affected by the divergent planes of nutrition (PERMANOVA: P ≥ 0.05) or by sampling time (P > 0.05). Microbial richness (observed ASVs) was also not different (P > 0.05) between the three groups of F0 rams at any of the sampling time points; however, microbial diversity (P < 0.05) in the F0 rams was influenced by sire dietary treatment. Microbial community structure, richness and diversity did not differ among the POS, MNT and NEG F1 generation rams (P > 0.05). Actinobacteriota, Firmicutes, Bacteroidota, Proteobacteria and Fusobacteriota were the most abundant phyla. Only Bacteroidota abundance was significantly (P < 0.05) different between three F0 groups, with POS rams had greater (18.6%) of this phylum on d 28 as compared with MNT (2.1%) and NEG (5.1%). The predominant genera identified included Fastidiosipila, Corynebacterium, Trueperella, Arthrobacter, Dietzia, Bifidobacterium, Streptobacillus, Ornithinimicrobium, and Porphyromonas, and their relative abundance was not affected (P > 0.05) by the dietary treatment in F0 rams. Overall, rams managed on positive and negative planes of nutrition harbored similar seminal microbiota to control rams, and divergent nutrition also had no effect on the offspring ram seminal microbiota.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».