Abstract B066: An AI approach to unraveling treatment response in pancreatic cancer: Insights from the COMPASS trial leveraging large language models (LLMs)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Pancreatic cancer, often termed the “silent killer” due to its vague symptoms and late diagnosis, continues to challenge oncologists with its significant treatment challenges and poor prognosis. Standard-of-care regimens, such as FOLFIRINOX (FFX) and Gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (GnP), show varied efficacy among patients. Understanding the factors that contribute to these varied responses is crucial for advancing personalized treatment strategies. This study uses NetraAI, a novel machine learning (ML) approach to analyze whole genome sequencing (WGS) and RNA sequencing (RNASeq) data from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) subjects (n=208) prior to FFX or GnP first-line combination therapy from the COMPASS trial, aiming to identify key variables that distinguish between responses to these two therapeutic regimens. NetraAI identifies explainable subpopulations within clinical trial data defined by a set of driving variables (i.e., hypotheses) related to drug response. This approach focuses on explaining only subjects that collectively represent a real effect and does not forcibly explain everyone, to avoid overfitting. Our analysis identified several key factors significantly correlating with treatment response. Downregulated LRRC8E and upregulated PTPRH showed favourable response to GnP, while upregulated UTG1A13p was associated with FFX response. Across all patients (stable disease, partial response, complete response) CLEC19A and LRRC29 expression were associated with better response to both FFX and GnP, suggesting that they may play a role in the chemotherapy response mechanisms. The NetraGPT module, leverages large language models (LLMs) and NetraAI insights to further query trial results. Querying NetraGPT, we identified a link between LRRC29 and HOOK1, associated with SHP, which has been linked to GnP response in non-small cell lung cancer. These findings suggest that chemotherapy response may be cancer-agnostic, depending on the chemotherapeutic agent, with LRRC29 expression discriminating selecting GnP versus FFX treatment. Our findings highlight the potential of AI in elucidating complex relationships within clinical trial data, offering valuable insights into the determinants of treatment response in pancreatic cancer to achieve more personalized cancer care. The identified biomarkers provide a promising foundation for developing personalized treatment strategies, enhancing the precision of therapeutic decisions. Integrating explainable ML methods for small and medium sized clinical data with LLMs provides an exciting step forward. Retrieval Augmentation allows researchers to create LLMs that are designed to answer questions about heterogeneous patient populations through the vantage of the various insights that have been discovered via specialized ML methods such as NetraAI and its NetraGPT module. We will provide a demo of how an interactive LLM was used to derive new insights into PDAC that may pave the way to precision treatment and explain how researchers can begin to create their own versions of these tools. Citation Format: Joseph Geraci, Bessi Qorri, Mike Tsay, Christian Cumbaa, Paul Leonchyk, Larry Alphs, Luca Pani. An AI approach to unraveling treatment response in pancreatic cancer: Insights from the COMPASS trial leveraging large language models (LLMs) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 15-18; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl_2):Abstract nr B066.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,010 | 0,012 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».