Evaluating The Patient Experience In Virtual Lung Cancer Exercise Rehabilitation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Exercise trials for people with lung cancer have experienced low adherence and high attrition. A virtual group exercise protocol may assist in overcoming reported barriers to participation, such as fatigue and challenges with travel to in-person programs. PURPOSE: To evaluate participant experience in a virtual, supervised, group-based exercise program for people with lung cancer. METHODS: Participants with inoperable lung cancer undergoing systemic therapy were recruited to "Mitigation of decline with Virtual Exercise (MoVE)," a prospective single-arm, feasibility trial (n = 27). The study was a 12-week, supervised, virtual group exercise intervention. In a purposive sample of participants (n = 9), semi-structured interviews were conducted by a research assistant who did not deliver the program. The interview focused on motivation, benefits and obstacles, proposed improvements, and willingness to pay. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Four themes were identified. 1) The program was perceived as beneficial: Participants reported a perceived increase in strength and capacity for exercise. 2) The delivery method was acceptable: The group environment played a significant role in motivating participants to attend; many reported feeling accountable to the group and a sense of community. Virtual delivery was cited as convenient, enabling many to attend most sessions. All participants reported feeling safe with only online supervision. 3) Obstacles: Technological obstacles such as trouble changing the video size or Internet connection were reported, but were resolved by the participant early in the program. 4) Suggestions for future programs: More opportunities for socializing beyond opening the video-conferencing room early, such as a hybrid delivery model, were suggested. Subsidized programs were looked upon favourably. Having a company sponsor the program was acceptable, though advertisements and anonymity were a concern. CONCLUSIONS: MoVE was well-accepted, and the virtual delivery method facilitated its success. This virtual group exercise design is feasible and acceptable for this population. Suggestions for future iterations of MoVE centered around increased opportunities for socializing and subsidized programming. BC Lung Foundation
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,013 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».