Time-restricted Eating As A Nutrition Strategy For Individuals During Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Feasibility Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a multi-modal program for secondary cardiac event prevention. Nutrition counselling is considered a core component of CR, where heart-healthy diets are commonly encouraged for the management of cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., body weight, blood pressure, glucose). However, many patients find it difficult to adhere to heart-healthy diets due to common barriers such as time. Time-restricted eating (TRE) is a form of intermittent fasting where individuals consume ad libitum energy intake within a set window of time, commonly 8 hours, and fast for the remaining 16 hours of the day (16:8 TRE). TRE has been shown to have positive effects on cardiovascular risk factors, may potentiate the effects of exercise, and has high patient feasibility. TRE may be an attractive addition to CR to enhance its effects on cardiovascular risk factors. PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of TRE for patients attending CR. METHODS: Men and women referred to CR for CVD (eating window >12 h/day) were enrolled in a parallel-group, randomized trial of CR only vs CR plus 16:8 TRE (CR + TRE).. Adherence to TRE was measured through participant responses to twice daily automated text messages with the times they started and stopped eating to calculate % of days with fasting >16 h. Safety was assessed as adverse events collected systematically via phone calls throughout the study. RESULTS: To date, n = 29 have enrolled, and 15 (CR + TRE, n = 7, 1 woman; CR only, n = 8, 2 women) have completed the intervention. CR + TRE participants responded to 90.3 ± 12.6% of text messages and were adherent to TRE 66.8 ± 30.1% of days. One adverse event of hypoglycemia has been reported, which was resolved by a CR physician recommending a reduction in diabetes medication. Reported TRE-related symptoms include nausea (n = 3) and dizziness (n = 1). CONCLUSION: Our preliminary findings suggest 16:8 TRE may be safe and feasible for individuals attending CR. Due to physician monitoring during CR, the occurrence of hypoglycemia in individuals with diabetes can be addressed quickly and safely. Completion of the present study will allow for a further understanding of the feasibility, safety, and benefits of TRE during CR.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».