Editorial: Solar neighborhood planning: optimize solar energy use in cities through the digitalization of the built environment
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
develop a digital platform to support to key players in urban energy planning to achieve the solar neighborhood standards, thus boosting the solar energy in the Nordic built environment. Wall (2024) presents the key points of IEA SHC Task 63, emphasizing the need to secure the "right to light" for everyone. Indeed, guaranteeing the solar access is the preliminary step for boosting solar energy generation and achieving adequate daylighting in a healthy environment (both indoor and outdoor). In addition, climate change and heat wave events highlight the need for "right to shade", especially in the context of urban heat island. However, there is a lack of specific standards to preserve these rights. Secondly, solar design involves not only active energy production with PV and thermal panels integrated into the building envelope, but also passive strategies that use sunlight to improve indoor and outdoor comfort while reducing energy consumption for heating, cooling, and lighting. (Hachem-Vermette et al., 2024). Further issues arise about competing uses of urban surfaces (Croce et al., 2022) as the same surface can have multiple potential usages (e.g., vegetation or solar panels). In this regard, combining two or more solar strategies can be a solution. Additionally, solar neighborhood planning needs to be supported by digital tools and key metrics (Kanters et al., 2022;2024) to (i) facilitate stakeholder engagement and citizen participation in the design process (Caballero et al., 2024), (ii) promote social acceptance of solar applications, and (iii) support communities in developing roadmaps for solar energy implementation. Finally, Task 63 explored innovative financing mechanisms and business models for solar neighborhoods to ensure long-term viability and to include and clarify added value (e.g., human health and well-being, resilience, energy security, biodiversity) (Wilczynski, 2024).The special issue contains a total of seven papers, three review papers and four original contributions.The review papers present global approaches and theoretical backgrounds that are central to solar neighborhood planning.Hachem-Vermette et al. review regulatory frameworks in five countries (Canada, Italy, Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland) related to solar access, passive, active, and general building energy regulations. They identify gaps in existing regulations, standards, and codes, and emphasize the need for future regulations to protect solar access and rights. The study reveals that solar energy legislation is generally scarce, lacks comprehensive planning, and is highly dependent on the national policy system -centralized or federal.reviewed 112 publications focusing on the model chain for horizontal-totilted irradiance conversion at high latitudes. The best-performing decomposition and transposition models were identified, considering multiple time resolutions (one-hour, one-minute) and specific configurations such as east-west (E-W) vertical bifacial photovoltaics (VBPV). This aspect is central, since the accuracy of the estimated solar potential influences the solar neighborhood planning.The main challenge in implementing solar energy in the existing built environment is the growing number of buildings classified as cultural heritage in Europe. Akbarinejad et al. review the economic, geographical, technical, conservative, legislative, and social challenges and barriers of adopting solar energy in high-sensitive neighborhoods in Norway. Potential solutions and strategies are identified to help stakeholders, experts, and authorities in successfully integrating solar energy systems in these areas.The second group of papers in the special issues showcase innovative concepts and applications at three different scales: regional, urban and neighborhood, group of buildings.Desthieux and Thebault present the project of the solar cadaster of the Greater Geneva (Switzerland and France). A major outcome was the creation of a public web platform that allows the simulation of PV self-consumption for each building in the region, providing key performance indicators for investment decisions. The project demonstrates that the solar cadaster fosters cohesion among local stakeholders, guiding them towards unified solar energy governance.Hasan et al. examine the relationship between density metrics and the solar potential of building rooftops and facades in Toronto (Canada). The study identifies key metrics affecting roof solar potential, including building height, density, proximity, and roof complexity. Using simulation models, it highlights which neighborhood profiles are best suited for retrofitting active solar technologies. This research offers a valuable framework for solar neighborhood design, particularly in existing urban areas like Toronto.The study by Viriyaroj et al. evaluates installation sites for VBPVs in low-rise urban neighborhoods at high latitudes. It highlights that E-W VBPVs align with residential electricity consumption, boosting self-consumption in areas with low solar elevation angles. The research compares VBPVs and monofacial PVs in three residential areas of Helsinki with different densities and shading. Simulations using PVSyst® reveal VBPV systems should be prioritized for unshaded areas.The study by Ranta et al. highlights the need to explore alternative surfaces for solar PV installations, like carports, and proposes reducing the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of these structures by substituting steel with wood. Simulations performed for Turku (Finland) and Dijon (France) showed that wood-based systems can halve the GHG emissions.In conclusion, many of the papers show the importance of digital tools for modeling solar access in the built environment. They also highlight that the implementation of solar solutions in the neighborhoods depends on the successful empowerment of stakeholders, especially when facing constraints and barriers. All these contributions cover large parts of the special issue topics focusing mostly on active solar strategies. Finally, four papers highlight the growing interest in solar energy at high latitudes as these regions present a unique solar irradiance pattern that can be particularly convenient for VBPV.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle