Notice bibliographique
Résumé
I remember my first meeting with Erving Polster: at my first Association for the Advancement of Gestalt Therapy (AAGT) conference in the mid-1990s during a drinks evening, where I saw him and Miriam Polster talking with people, and so I did not interrupt. I stood back and admired in real life the people (Erv and Miriam) who had taught the man with whom I had trained, Don Diespecker, back in Australia. In those days, everyone in Australia went to the United States to complete training, as our training scene was still developing. It was a time of great change for Australia in Gestalt therapy. Coming to AAGT was a tremendous education for me, and meeting people like Erving and Miriam Polster was like seeing movie stars in Hollywood.It was not until more than a decade later, when I had become president of AAGT and we were having our conference in Vancouver, Canada, that I got to meet and collaborate with Erv in a more intimate way. I was going to give the presidential address and then introduce our keynote speaker, Erving Polster. I remember that, as part of the speech, I used verses from the Australian band, “The Seekers,” formed in Melbourne in 1962. I adopted and adapted some of their verses for AAGT: “We are one, and we are many / And from all the lands of the earth we come / We share a dream, and sing with one voice / I am, you are, we are AAGT.”In his opening address, Erv commended the poem, saying that while it might seem a little folksy, it was totally appropriate for our organization. He then launched into a speech about Life Focus Communities, which meant so much to him. It was during this speech that a most memorable event happened. In the middle of speaking, he suddenly stopped and said, “Miriam is with me now.” The audience gasped. There was a beautiful silence and many tearful eyes. Erv then proceeded with his speech. As someone who has studied the Near-Death Experience, this meant a lot to me and obviously meant a lot to Erv.After the session, I caught up with Erv, and we talked, including about Life Focus. We decided to collaborate on a book, as I was also interested in communities. Joined by Malcolm Parlett, who wrote the Foreword, and Erv, who wrote a Commentary, I edited and produced Community, Psychotherapy and Life Focus: A Gestalt Anthology of the History, Theory and Practice of Living in Community (2012), a compilation of essays by some of the top names in the field of Gestalt therapy. In developing that book with Erv, and later when he wrote the introduction to my edited book, Our Search for Meaning: Essays on Spirituality and Gestalt Therapy (2012), I came to realize what a prolific writer Erv was—constantly coming up with new ideas, writing, and rewriting. Clearly, a key figure in Gestalt therapy, and someone I have come to know, love, and appreciate.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».