MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4402878723 · doi:10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.09.008

COVID-19 Pandemic–Related Prenatal Distress and Infant Functional Brain Development

2024· article· en· W4402878723 sur OpenAlexafffundabout
Aliza Jaffer, Kathryn Y. Manning, Gerald F. Giesbrecht, Lianne Tomfohr-Madsen, Catherine Lebel

Notice bibliographique

RevueJAACAP Open · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta Children's Hospital Research InstituteJacobs Foundation
Mots-clésCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PandemicBrain development2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)DistressPsychologyMedicineVirologyNeuroscienceClinical psychologyPathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Objective Psychological distress (eg, anxiety and depression) during pregnancy can disrupt fetal brain development and negatively affect infant behavior. Prenatal distress rose substantially during the COVID-19 pandemic according to most, but not all, studies, raising concerns about its potential effects on brain connectivity and behavior in infants. Method We investigated 63 mother–infant pairs as part of the Pregnancy during the COVID-19 Pandemic study. Mothers reported depression and anxiety symptoms prospectively during pregnancy; these were combined into one measure of prenatal maternal distress. Infant brain resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) scans were obtained at 3 months of age, and mothers assessed infant behavior at 6 and 12 months using the Infant Behavior Questionnaire—Revised (IBQ-R) and the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ-3), respectively. The rs-fMRI was processed to measure functional connectivity within auditory, left frontoparietal, and default mode networks, and connectivity was tested for relationships to prenatal maternal distress. Prenatal distress and brain connectivity were also tested for relationships with infant behavior. Results Higher prenatal maternal distress was related to stronger functional connectivity in the infant auditory network (T = 2.5, p = 0.01, q=0.04, df=59) and higher infant ASQ-3 personal–social scores (T = 2.9, p = 0.006, q=0.03, df=48). No significant associations were found between brain connectivity and infant behavior. Conclusion The impact of exposure to maternal prenatal distress on infant brain networks may be more apparent in networks that develop early, such as the auditory network, compared to later-developing networks, the effects of which may emerge later in childhood. The link between prenatal maternal distress and higher infant behavior scores may suggest compensatory changes, although further study is needed to determine how behavior manifests in the longer term. Plain language summary During the COVID-19 pandemic, pregnant individuals were especially stressed, but the impacts on infant brain development are still unclear. This study measured anxiety and depression symptoms in 63 mothers during pregnancy and performed resting-state functional brain magnetic resonance imaging scans in their infants at 3 months of age at the Alberta Children's Hospital. Mothers who experienced higher distress during pregnancy had infants with stronger functional communication within the auditory brain network and more advanced social behaviors. Our findings show the importance of studying a range of brain regions beyond those involved in emotion and suggest the need for continued monitoring of this infant cohort through early childhood. Diversity & Inclusion Statement We worked to ensure sex and gender balance in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure race, ethnic, and/or other types of diversity in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure that the study questionnaires were prepared in an inclusive way. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented sexual and/or gender groups in science. The author list of this paper includes contributors from the location and/or community where the research was conducted who participated in the data collection, design, analysis, and/or interpretation of the work. We actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our author group. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,570
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,055
Tête enseignante GPT0,361
Écart entre enseignants0,306 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2024
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJAACAP OpenMême sujetMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumTravaux en français237 207