Ethical considerations in AgeTech: Towards inclusive and equitable solutions
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
PurposeIn the realm of technology-driven solutions for older adults, known as AgeTech, there exists a promising landscape where advancements can significantly enhance the health, autonomy, and overall quality of life for elderly individuals (Sixsmith, 2021).These innovations not only enable aging individuals to remain independent within their familiar environments but also revolutionize the delivery of essential services.However, within this realm of potential, lies a pressing need to address ethical challenges such as the protection of the fundamental rights, privacy, and well-being of older individuals, particularly in an era marked by rapid technological advancement (Rubeis et al., 2022; Ryan and Gutman, 2023).Method This study embarked on a comprehensive exploration of these ethical quandaries through a series of six 2-hour workshops (n=3 in Canada; n=3 in Scotland).These workshops convened Canadian and European stakeholders, including academics, healthcare and social work professionals, engineers, and representatives from the older adult community.Through thematic analysis employing a reflexive team approach, each workshop's data were treated as separate datasets, then amalgamated to identify key themes, with discussions delving into the ethical dimensions inherent in AgeTech research and development. Results and DiscussionThe workshops highlighted key ethical concerns, including the unexpected ways older people are left behind in AgeTech research and development.They also addressed opportunities to shift ethical thinking around personal agency, protection, and privacy.Additionally, the workshops discussed the intended and unintended consequences of implementing technologies, including their potential to replace elements of interaction or contribute to the worsening of existing power imbalances.Our analysis highlighted the need to integrate perspectives of older people, particularly those from marginalized groups such as those from the LGBTQ+ community, racialized minorities, and economically disadvantaged communities, into the fabric of AgeTech processes.Furthermore, participants advocated for the establishment of inclusive co-creation workshops as a means to nurture ethical awareness and action.Additionally, the analysis emphasized the significance of fostering cultural shifts within the AgeTech landscape, steering it towards a more equitable and ethically-sound trajectory.In essence, this research underscores the indispensable nature of addressing ethical considerations in AgeTech.Doing so not only promises positive outcomes for older adults yet also holds the potential to bridge the digital divide and forestall any unintended negative consequences that may arise in the AgeTech arena.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle