Adherence to guideline-recommended cardiac screening in Medicaid-enrolled survivors of childhood cancer: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS).
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
56 Background: Childhood cancer survivors face increased risks of heart failure and myocardial dysfunction associated with cancer treatment exposure. Children’s Oncology Group (COG) guidelines recommend periodic cardiac screening for survivors exposed to anthracycline or radiation. However, the extent of adherence to cardiac screening among Medicaid-enrolled survivors—a group typically characterized by socioeconomic disadvantages—remains unclear. Additionally, as Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act has occurred in most, but not all states, cardiac screening adherence may vary based on survivors' state of residence. Methods: Data from the CCSS were linked to administrative Medicaid insurance claims from 2015 to 2019. We included at-risk survivors (i.e., received radiation to chest or heart, total body irradiation, and/or anthracyclines), aged 18-64 years, continuously covered by Medicaid during 2015-2019, and without a history of grade 3-4 cardiovascular conditions by 2019 to ensure the identified cardiac tests were for screening purposes. Our primary outcome assessed adherence to COG guidelines (V4.0) based on age- and therapy dose-specific frequency of cardiac testing (i.e., echocardiogram, multigated acquisition scan, or magnetic resonance imaging) during the study period. Multivariable logistic models assessed sociodemographic, clinical, and policy-related factors associated with adherence, with adjusted probability differences (i.e., marginal effects [MEs]) reported. Results: We identified 1,062 survivors at risk of cardiovascular conditions, with 57.0% female, 52.8% young adults (ages 18-39 years), and 72.8% non-Hispanic White. During 2015-2019, 285 (26.8%) survivors received any cardiac test, and 102 (9.6%) adhered to COG guideline-based frequency of cardiac testing. In multivariable models, survivors residing in states that expanded Medicaid in 2014 and later has 4.3 percentage points (ppts, 95% CI=0.58.1, p =0.025) and 6.1 ppts (95% CI=0.611.6, p =0.031) increased likelihood of adhering to guideline-based frequency of cardiac testing respectively compared to states that did not. Compared to leukemia survivors, the likelihood of adhering to guideline-based frequency of cardiac testing was higher in survivors of central nervous system tumors (ME=7.6 ppt, 95% CI=2.712.6, p =0.002), Hodgkin lymphoma (ME=10.7 ppt, 95% CI=1.320.1, p =0.026), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (ME=9.4, 95% CI=1.017.8, p =0.028). Conclusions: Adherence to risk-based cardiac testing is low among Medicaid-enrolled survivors of childhood cancer, and associated with residence in a Medicaid expansion state and cancer type. Policy reforms toward improving affordable, continuous health insurance coverage are important means to increase adherence to guideline-based cardiac tests among survivors.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,011 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».