5092 Effect of Fezolinetant Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes: Data from Phase 3b study (DAYLIGHT) for Moderate-To-Severe Vasomotor Symptoms Associated with Menopause in Women Considered Unsuitable for Hormone Therapy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Disclosure: M. Shapiro C.M.: Advisory Board Member; Self; Aspen, Astellas, Bayer, BioSyent, Duchesnay, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Mithra, Pfizer, Searchlight, Sprout, Sunovion, Therapeutics, Inc.. Consulting Fee; Self; Aspen, Astellas, Bayer, BioSyent, Duchesnay, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Mithra, Pfizer, Searchlight, Sprout, Sunovion, Therapeutics, Inc.. Other; Self; fulfils a leadership or fiduciary role for the International Menopause Society, fulfils a leadership or fiduciary role for Research Canada, fulfils a leadership or fiduciary role for Terry Fox Research Institute, Inc., This study was funded by Astellas Pharma Inc. Medical writing support was provided by Yien Liu from Envision Pharma, Inc. and funded by the study sponsor. X. Wu: Employee; Self; Astellas Pharma Inc. X. Wang: Employee; Self; Astellas Pharma Inc. K. Miyazaki: Employee; Self; Astellas Pharma Inc. A. Morga: Employee; Self; Astellas Pharma Inc. R.E. Nappi: Other; Self; past financial relationships (lecturer, member of advisory boards, and/or consultant) with Boehringer Ingelheim, past financial relationships (lecturer, member of advisory boards, and/or consultant) with Eli Lilly, past financial relationships (lecturer, member of advisory boards, and/or consultant) with Endoceutics, past financial relationships (lecturer, member of advisory boards, and/or consultant) with Exeltis, past financial relationships (lecturer, member of advisory boards, and/or consultant) with Novo Nordisk, past financial relationships (lecturer, member of advisory boards, and/or consultant) with Palatin Technologies, past financial relationships (lecturer, member of advisory boards, and/or consultant) with Pfizer, past financial relationships (lecturer, member of advisory boards, and/or consultant) with Procter & Gamble, past financial relationships (lecturer, member of advisory boards, and/or consultant) with Teva Women's Health, past financial relationships (lecturer, member of advisory boards, and/or consultant) with Zombon, ongoing relationships with Abbott, ongoing relationships with Astellas, ongoing relationships with Bayer HealthCare, ongoing relationships with Fidia, ongoing relationships with Gedeon Richter, ongoing relationships with HRA Pharma, ongoing relationships with Merck & Co, ongoing relationships with Organon, ongoing relationships with Shionogi, ongoing relationships with Theramex, ongoing relationships with Viatris, President Elect of the International Menopause Society. P. Stute: Consulting Fee; Self; Astellas. Speaker; Self; Bayer HealthCare, Besins Healthcare, Effik, Exeltis, Gedeon Richter, Jenapharm, Labatec, Pharmacosmos, Theramex, Zeller. Other; Self; board member for the Deutsche Menopause Gesellschaft and the European Menopause and Andropause Society, President of the Swiss Society for Gynecological Endocrinology and Menopause. K. Martins: Employee; Self; Astellas Pharma Inc. K. Schaudig: Other; Self; Consultant and lecturer for aidhere, Consultant and lecturer for Astellas, Consultant and lecturer for Bayer HealthCare, Consultant and lecturer for Besins Healthcare, Consultant and lecturer for Exeltis, Consultant and lecturer for Gedeon Richter, Consultant and lecturer for Jenapharm, Consultant and lecturer for Mylan, Consultant and lecturer for Novo Nordisk, Consultant and lecturer for Organon, Consultant and lecturer for Theramex, Consultant and lecturer for Viatris, Consultant and lecturer for Laborarztpraxis Rhein-Main, President of the German Menopause Society (Deutsche Menopause Gesellschaft e.V.). Introduction: Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) associated with menopause can significantly impact health-related qualify of life (QoL). Fezolinetant is a nonhormonal, selective neurokinin 3 receptor antagonist that is approved in the US for the treatment of moderate-to-severe VMS due to menopause. Objective: To report patient-reported QoL outcomes in the 24-week placebo-controlled DAYLIGHT study. Methods: DAYLIGHT (NCT05033886) was a phase 3b, randomised, double-blind, 24-week placebo-controlled study. Participants were women aged ≥40 to ≤65 years with moderate-to-severe VMS who were unsuitable for HT based on contraindications, caution (prior medical history), stoppers (lack of efficacy, side effects, or medical advice), or averse (made informed choice not to take HT after discussion with clinician), randomised 1:1 to placebo or fezolinetant 45 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was mean change in daily VMS frequency of moderate-to-severe episodes from baseline to Week 24. Secondary endpoints included patient-reported sleep disturbance (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sleep Disturbance – Short Form 8b [PROMIS SD SF 8b]. Exploratory endpoints measured QoL improvements with patient-reported outcomes of sleep disturbance (PGI-S/PGI-C SD, MENQOL) and VMS (PGI-C VMS, WPAI VMS). Treatment policy estimand was used for all exploratory efficacy endpoint analyses. Results Overall, 453 women were enrolled (placebo n=226; fezolinetant n=227), including HT contraindicated (51, 11%), caution (165, 36%), stoppers (69, 15%), and averse (168, 37%). DAYLIGHT results met the primary objective showing statistically significant reduction from baseline in the frequency of moderate-to-severe VMS to week 24 for fezolinetant 45 mg once daily versus placebo. Through week 24, no safety signals of concern were apparent for 45 mg fezolinetant dose. At week 24, statistically significant improvements from baseline were seen in the fezolinetant 45 mg group compared to placebo in PROMIS SD SF 8b total score (least squares [LS] mean difference: –2.5; 95% CI –3.9, –1.1; p<0.001), MENQOL total score (LS mean difference: –0.44; 95% CI –0.69, –0.18; p<0.001), and WPAI-VMS (activity impairment [p<0.001], overall work productivity loss [p=0.036], and presenteeism [p=0.002] domains). A higher proportion of participants in the fezolinetant group reported positive changes in sleep disturbance (PGI-C SD, p<0.001), sleep disturbance severity (PGI-S SD, p=0.042), and VMS (PGI-C VMS, p<0.001) compared to placebo at week 24. Conclusions: DAYLIGHT is the first study of fezolinetant to investigate efficacy versus placebo over 24 weeks. Fezolinetant 45 mg was efficacious and well tolerated for moderate-to-severe VMS in women considered unsuitable for HT. A range of patient-reported outcomes demonstrate that reductions in VMS frequency with fezolinetant treatment led to improvements in QoL. Presentation: 6/3/2024
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».