MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4403153858 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvae163.1587

5092 Effect of Fezolinetant Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes: Data from Phase 3b study (DAYLIGHT) for Moderate-To-Severe Vasomotor Symptoms Associated with Menopause in Women Considered Unsuitable for Hormone Therapy

2024· article· en· W4403153858 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Marla Shapiro, Xi Wu, Xuegong Wang, Kentaro Miyazaki, Antonia Morga, Rossella E. Nappi, Petra Stute, Karla Martins, Katrin Schaudig

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesAstellas PharmaShionogiNovo NordiskGedeon RichterAstellas Foundation for Research on Metabolic DisordersBayer HealthCareMylan
Mots-clésVasomotorMenopauseMedicineHormone therapyHormoneInternal medicineBreast cancerCancer

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Disclosure: M. Shapiro C.M.: Advisory Board Member; Self; Aspen, Astellas, Bayer, BioSyent, Duchesnay, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Mithra, Pfizer, Searchlight, Sprout, Sunovion, Therapeutics, Inc.. Consulting Fee; Self; Aspen, Astellas, Bayer, BioSyent, Duchesnay, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Mithra, Pfizer, Searchlight, Sprout, Sunovion, Therapeutics, Inc.. Other; Self; fulfils a leadership or fiduciary role for the International Menopause Society, fulfils a leadership or fiduciary role for Research Canada, fulfils a leadership or fiduciary role for Terry Fox Research Institute, Inc., This study was funded by Astellas Pharma Inc. Medical writing support was provided by Yien Liu from Envision Pharma, Inc. and funded by the study sponsor. X. Wu: Employee; Self; Astellas Pharma Inc. X. Wang: Employee; Self; Astellas Pharma Inc. K. Miyazaki: Employee; Self; Astellas Pharma Inc. A. Morga: Employee; Self; Astellas Pharma Inc. R.E. Nappi: Other; Self; past financial relationships (lecturer, member of advisory boards, and/or consultant) with Boehringer Ingelheim, past financial relationships (lecturer, member of advisory boards, and/or consultant) with Eli Lilly, past financial relationships (lecturer, member of advisory boards, and/or consultant) with Endoceutics, past financial relationships (lecturer, member of advisory boards, and/or consultant) with Exeltis, past financial relationships (lecturer, member of advisory boards, and/or consultant) with Novo Nordisk, past financial relationships (lecturer, member of advisory boards, and/or consultant) with Palatin Technologies, past financial relationships (lecturer, member of advisory boards, and/or consultant) with Pfizer, past financial relationships (lecturer, member of advisory boards, and/or consultant) with Procter & Gamble, past financial relationships (lecturer, member of advisory boards, and/or consultant) with Teva Women's Health, past financial relationships (lecturer, member of advisory boards, and/or consultant) with Zombon, ongoing relationships with Abbott, ongoing relationships with Astellas, ongoing relationships with Bayer HealthCare, ongoing relationships with Fidia, ongoing relationships with Gedeon Richter, ongoing relationships with HRA Pharma, ongoing relationships with Merck & Co, ongoing relationships with Organon, ongoing relationships with Shionogi, ongoing relationships with Theramex, ongoing relationships with Viatris, President Elect of the International Menopause Society. P. Stute: Consulting Fee; Self; Astellas. Speaker; Self; Bayer HealthCare, Besins Healthcare, Effik, Exeltis, Gedeon Richter, Jenapharm, Labatec, Pharmacosmos, Theramex, Zeller. Other; Self; board member for the Deutsche Menopause Gesellschaft and the European Menopause and Andropause Society, President of the Swiss Society for Gynecological Endocrinology and Menopause. K. Martins: Employee; Self; Astellas Pharma Inc. K. Schaudig: Other; Self; Consultant and lecturer for aidhere, Consultant and lecturer for Astellas, Consultant and lecturer for Bayer HealthCare, Consultant and lecturer for Besins Healthcare, Consultant and lecturer for Exeltis, Consultant and lecturer for Gedeon Richter, Consultant and lecturer for Jenapharm, Consultant and lecturer for Mylan, Consultant and lecturer for Novo Nordisk, Consultant and lecturer for Organon, Consultant and lecturer for Theramex, Consultant and lecturer for Viatris, Consultant and lecturer for Laborarztpraxis Rhein-Main, President of the German Menopause Society (Deutsche Menopause Gesellschaft e.V.). Introduction: Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) associated with menopause can significantly impact health-related qualify of life (QoL). Fezolinetant is a nonhormonal, selective neurokinin 3 receptor antagonist that is approved in the US for the treatment of moderate-to-severe VMS due to menopause. Objective: To report patient-reported QoL outcomes in the 24-week placebo-controlled DAYLIGHT study. Methods: DAYLIGHT (NCT05033886) was a phase 3b, randomised, double-blind, 24-week placebo-controlled study. Participants were women aged ≥40 to ≤65 years with moderate-to-severe VMS who were unsuitable for HT based on contraindications, caution (prior medical history), stoppers (lack of efficacy, side effects, or medical advice), or averse (made informed choice not to take HT after discussion with clinician), randomised 1:1 to placebo or fezolinetant 45 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was mean change in daily VMS frequency of moderate-to-severe episodes from baseline to Week 24. Secondary endpoints included patient-reported sleep disturbance (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sleep Disturbance – Short Form 8b [PROMIS SD SF 8b]. Exploratory endpoints measured QoL improvements with patient-reported outcomes of sleep disturbance (PGI-S/PGI-C SD, MENQOL) and VMS (PGI-C VMS, WPAI VMS). Treatment policy estimand was used for all exploratory efficacy endpoint analyses. Results Overall, 453 women were enrolled (placebo n=226; fezolinetant n=227), including HT contraindicated (51, 11%), caution (165, 36%), stoppers (69, 15%), and averse (168, 37%). DAYLIGHT results met the primary objective showing statistically significant reduction from baseline in the frequency of moderate-to-severe VMS to week 24 for fezolinetant 45 mg once daily versus placebo. Through week 24, no safety signals of concern were apparent for 45 mg fezolinetant dose. At week 24, statistically significant improvements from baseline were seen in the fezolinetant 45 mg group compared to placebo in PROMIS SD SF 8b total score (least squares [LS] mean difference: –2.5; 95% CI –3.9, –1.1; p<0.001), MENQOL total score (LS mean difference: –0.44; 95% CI –0.69, –0.18; p<0.001), and WPAI-VMS (activity impairment [p<0.001], overall work productivity loss [p=0.036], and presenteeism [p=0.002] domains). A higher proportion of participants in the fezolinetant group reported positive changes in sleep disturbance (PGI-C SD, p<0.001), sleep disturbance severity (PGI-S SD, p=0.042), and VMS (PGI-C VMS, p<0.001) compared to placebo at week 24. Conclusions: DAYLIGHT is the first study of fezolinetant to investigate efficacy versus placebo over 24 weeks. Fezolinetant 45 mg was efficacious and well tolerated for moderate-to-severe VMS in women considered unsuitable for HT. A range of patient-reported outcomes demonstrate that reductions in VMS frequency with fezolinetant treatment led to improvements in QoL. Presentation: 6/3/2024

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,024

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,059
Tête enseignante GPT0,377
Écart entre enseignants0,318 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of the Endocrine SocietyMême sujetMenopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207