Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The results of the VULNER project that are discussed in this book, with the enormous advantage of being able, quite rightly, to claim to be based to a very large extent on first-hand observations in situ gleaned from a very wide variety of contexts, do not point a finger at anyone specifically, but make it absolutely clear that without a reasoning that is deeply rooted in the empirical reality of humanitarian migration, any concept-in this case that of vulnerability-runs the risk of not being able to achieve what it was designed to do, namely to genuinely protect the weakest.The fact of the matter is that, in practice, the concept of vulnerability acts as a filter, one that is certainly in the interests of a large number of destination countries.One could not be more cynical.One of the great merits of the book's authors, who worked together at a steady pace for three years, is that they succeeded in subjecting a central concept of European asylum and immigration policy to a 'reality check'.The result is certainly a highly disconcerting observation.At the same time, it is an invitation to proceed in the same way with other fundamental concepts/aspects/principles underlying migration policy in Europe, whether that of the European Union or of the individual Member States.Let us make no mistake: the conditions for survival in an everincreasing number of countries around the world are such that it is perfectly understandable that people look for ways out for themselves and their families.In their place, everyone would do the same.A policy that is formulated in an exclusively reactive way does not provide the answer, or else it is overstretched, as the authors have demonstrated through their study of the practical application, in an everyday context, of the concept of vulnerability.In the coming years, throughout Europe and at EU level, the real challenge will be to review the coexistence of a policy dictated strictly by economic needs-not only of the countries of destination but also of the people's countries of origin-and a policy that considers humanitarian protection as a truly equal priority and that is meant to benefit those who are truly in need of protection.At the closing conference of the VULNER project on 9 June 2023, James C. Hathaway suggested that anyone, especially those seeking humanitarian protection, should be treated as a priority.This should be feasible in the medium term, provided that the interests at stake are rebalanced, with priority being given to enabling the countries of origin to offer their local populations realistic prospects for a not-too-distant future.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».