Data Verification and Respondent Validity for a Web-Based Sexual Health Survey: Tutorial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: As technology continues to shape the landscape of health research, the utilization of web-based surveys for collecting sexual health information among adolescents and young adults has become increasingly prevalent. However, this shift toward digital platforms brings forth a new set of challenges, particularly the infiltration of automated bots that can compromise data integrity and the reliability of survey results. Objective: We aimed to outline the data verification process used in our study design, which employed survey programming and data cleaning protocols. Methods: A 26-item survey was developed and programmed with several data integrity functions, including reCAPTCHA scores, RelevantID fraud and duplicate scores, verification of IP addresses, and honeypot questions. Participants aged 15-24 years were recruited via social media advertisements over 7 weeks and received a US $15 incentive after survey completion. Data verification occurred through a 2-part cleaning process, which removed responses that were incomplete, flagged as spam by Qualtrics, or from duplicate IP addresses, or those that did not meet the inclusion criteria. Final comparisons of reported age with date of birth and reported state with state inclusion criteria were performed. Participants who completed the study survey were linked to a second survey to receive their incentive. Responses without first and last names and full addresses were removed, as were those with duplicate IP addresses or the exact same longitude and latitude coordinates. Finally, IP addresses used to complete both surveys were compared, and consistent responses were eligible for an incentive. Results: Over 7 weeks, online advertisements for a web-based survey reached 1.4 million social media users. Of the 20,585 survey responses received, 4589 (22.3%) were verified. Incentives were sent to 462 participants; of these, 14 responses were duplicates and 3 contained discrepancies, resulting in a final sample of 445 responses. Conclusions: Confidential web-based surveys are an appealing method for reaching populations-particularly adolescents and young adults, who may be reluctant to disclose sensitive information to family, friends, or clinical providers. Web-based surveys are a useful tool for researchers targeting hard-to-reach populations due to the difficulty in obtaining a representative sample. However, researchers face the ongoing threat of bots and fraudulent participants in a technology-driven world, necessitating the adoption of evolving bot detection software and tailored protocols for data collection in unique contexts.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,171 | 0,312 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,007 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,018 | 0,009 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».