To Evaluate and Distinguish the Effects of Art Therapy and Visual Color Cues to Ameliorate the Symptoms of Parkinson’s Disease - A Pilot Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Parkinson’s disease is the 2nd most common neurodegenerative disease that worsens with time and mostly affects movement. The disease depicts complex multi-system symptomatology which includes both motor as well as non-motor manifestations. Complementary and alternative remedies are increasingly being used to treat its symptoms. Acknowledging the complex nature of Parkinson's disease (PD) symptoms, this research aims to treat both motor and non-motor symptoms, with a particular emphasis on gait abnormalities and cognitive loss. The study intends to examine how well two intervention strategies—visual color signals and art therapy— to improve overall cognitive functionality and FOG in people with Parkinson's disease. OBJECTIVES: Study aimed to determine and distinguish the effectiveness of Art Therapy and Visual Color Cues on mainly cognitive skills and gait pattern in Parkinson's sufferers. The research aims to further our understanding of the connection between PD patients' gait, cognition, and treatment interventions. Through an extensive analysis of recent research findings and literature, the study seeks to provide light on how these factors interact and the potential effectiveness of different treatment approaches in treating Parkinson's disease symptoms. METHOD: This study included 30 Parkinson's patients. In order to evaluate the efficacy of art therapy and visual cue training as two intervention modalities in enhancing cognitive abilities and freezing of gait (FOG) in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD), a randomized controlled experiment was carried out. Each intervention group consisted of 15 individuals who were assessed before and after the trials, randomized at random to undergo 6 weeks of therapies, which included regular physiotherapy sessions three times a week for 40 minutes each. The art therapy group participated in a variety of creative activities meant to improve gait, attention, motivation, emotional control, and cognitive performance. However, the visual cue training group learned how to employ visual cues—like colored papers or objects on the floor—to enhance gait start and turning as well as cognitive status. The results of the six-week therapy period based on MOCA and Mini BESTest scores were compared to ascertain the effectiveness of each strategy in treating FOG and cognitive function in individuals with Parkinson's disease. RESULTS: When Art Therapy (AT) and Visual Color Cues (VCC) were compared for Parkinson's patients, it was discovered that AT improved cognitive performance more as measured by improved Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) scores. Patient’s outcomes for mobility and balance, as determined by the Mini-BES Test, differed, with some responding better to VCC and others to AT. The necessity for individualized treatment methods was highlighted by statistical analysis, which demonstrated substantial variations in MOCA and Mini-BES Test ratings among the two regimens. CONCLUSION: This study concluded that both AT and VCC significantly improve cognitive function and gait performance in PD patients. However, the nature of the improvements suggests that while AT may have a more substantial impact on cognitive functions, VCC may be more effective in enhancing motor functions. Altogether, Art Therapy and Visual Color Cues both present viable non-pharmacological interventions for improving the symptoms of Parkinson’s Disease. Key words: Art Therapy; Visual Color Cues; MOCA; Mini BES Test; Parkinson Disease; FOG; Visuo-spatial Functions; Cognition
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».