Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This year, initiatives relevant to Arctic environmental protection occurred through the Arctic Council and other international cooperative avenues. These include advancing implementation of the Agreement to Prevent Unregulated High Seas Fisheries in the Central Arctic Ocean, working through the International Maritime Organization (IMO) to further address Arctic shipping issues, and seeking environmental cooperation through the Barents Euro-Arctic Council. Arctic Council activities were substantially curbed this year due to Russia’s continued military activities against Ukraine. The thirteenth meeting of the Arctic Council was held in May in Salekhard, Russian Federation, and online, but only a one-page statement, rather than a ministerial declaration, was issued on 11 May. Arctic States and Permanent Participants acknowledged the commitment to safeguard and strengthen the Arctic Council and agreed to continue Council activities for 2023–5 based on previous work plans, which included the Reykjavik Ministerial Declaration of May 2021 and the Arctic Council Strategic Plan 2021–30. The statement further acknowledged the Russian Federation’s conclusion of a second term as chair of the Council and accepted Norway’s offer to act as chair of the Council in 2023–5 and to host the fourteenth meeting of the Council in 2025. In August, consensus was reached to allow Arctic Council working groups to advance project activities via written procedures but still not through official virtual meetings ( and Statement (11 May 2023) ). As the new Council chair, Norway announced four thematic priorities for its chairship ( ). A second in-person meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP) to the Agreement to Prevent Unregulated High Seas Fisheries in the Central Arctic Ocean (COAFA) was held in Incheon, Korea, on 12–14 June ( ). The COP adopted a Joint Program of Scientific Research and Monitoring (JPSRM) Framework, which incorporates a Data Management and Sharing Protocol. The JPSRM will focus on three ecologically linked zones—not only the high seas of the central Arctic Ocean (Agreement Area) but also peripheral continental shelf/slope areas and the Pacific and Atlantic gateways. The JPSRM, through mapping and monitoring phases, will assess four main issues: the status of knowledge and gaps in knowledge regarding ecosystem structures and functions in the Agreement Area and adjacent waters; prospects for sustainable commercial fisheries in the Agreement Area; potential impacts of commercial fisheries on marine ecosystems linked to the central Arctic Ocean; and potential impacts of commercial fisheries on Arctic indigenous and local communities. Attendees at the COP adopted the Rules of Procedure for the Scientific Coordinating Group (SCG), which is tasked with supporting scientific work under the CAOFA. Each party to the Agreement is to be a member of the SCG and each member is to be represented by a delegation that may include scientists, technical experts, holders of Indigenous knowledge, and holders of local knowledge. At the COP, an agenda was set for further implementation steps. The SCG was tasked with developing a detailed implementation plan for the JPSRM Framework by June 2024. An Ad Hoc Working Group on Exploratory Fishing was established in order to develop, by June 2024, a draft text of Conservation and Management Measures for exploratory fishing. Parties agreed to meet in person for a third COP in Korea in June 2024, at a date to be confirmed by the hosts. At its 107th session is June, the IMO’s Maritime Safety Committee adopted amendments to the Polar Shipping Code to extend safety of navigation and voyage planning requirements to a range of smaller vessels ( ). The requirements will apply to three categories of ships while operating in polar waters: fishing vessels of twenty-four metres in length and above; pleasure yachts of three hundred gross tonnage (GT) and upwards not engaged in trade; and cargo ships of three hundred GT and upwards but below five hundred GT. Navigational equipment must be able to function under expected environmental conditions in the area of operation and ships must have the ability to visually detect ice when operating in darkness. In voyage planning, masters of vessels must take into account various factors in determining a route including, among others, known areas of marine mammal densities and seasonal migration areas and any national and international protected areas. The topic of reducing the impact on the Arctic of black carbon emissions from international shipping was further considered by the IMO’s Sub-Committee on Pollution Prevention and Response and the Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC). However, no further agreement was reached regarding black carbon control measures and the geographic scope of Arctic waters that might be covered (MEPC 80/17 (28 July 2023), para 5.15). In April, Canada informed the MEPC of its plan to submit a proposal to the eighty-first session of the MFPC in 2024 for the designation of an Emission Control Area in Canadian Arctic waters. Such a designation would aim to reduce emission of nitrogen oxides, sulphur oxides, and particulate matter, including black carbon (MEPC 80/16/2 (27 April 2023)). Cooperation in the Barents Euro-Arctic Region, although curtailed due to Russia’s continued military activities against Ukraine, was able to continue. Following Russia’s withdrawal from the BEAC in September, members of the BEAC met in Joensuu, Finland, on 24 October, issued a joint statement welcoming the interim trio presidency of Finland, Sweden, and Norway for a one-year period, and encouraged them to drive Barents cooperation forward ( ). In the spring, the Finnish chair presented a joint Green Transition Action Plan for the northern regions of Finland, Sweden, and Norway and encouraged the respective governments to implement proposed recommendations, which include the need to develop a regulatory environment to support green investments including in fossil free energy. A subgroup of the BEAC’s Working Group on Environment, Friends of Sustainable Production and Consumption is undertaking various project activities, including Sustainable Green Transition in the Barents Region, 2023–5 and Climate Work in the Barents Region, 2023–4. The eleventh Barents Parliamentary Conference was held in Rovaniemi, Finland, on 25–7 September. Its conclusions emphasized that the Green Transition needs to be secured while respecting the culture and human rights of peoples living in the region, including the implementation of the prior and informed consent principle with regard to the indigenous Sámi people ( ).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,423 | 0,304 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».