A Comparative Study of Frontal and Cerebellar Lobe Volumes Between Patients With First-Episode Schizophrenia and Healthy Controls and Its Association With Psychopathology and Neurological Soft Signs in Patients
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Objectives Our study aimed to investigate the fronto-cerebellar volumes in both patients and controls, as well as explore their relationship with symptomatology. Our primary objectives were to compare the frontal and cerebellar lobe volumetric measurements between patients with first-episode schizophrenia (FES) and healthy controls and to assess the relationship of these volumes with psychopathology, cognition, and neurological soft signs in FES patients. The secondary objective was to explore the association of fronto-cerebellar lobe volumes with socio-demographic factors among patients and controls, as well as the duration of untreated illness (DUI) among patients. Materials and methods This was a cross-sectional, case-control study involving 60 participants, including 30 antipsychotic-naïve FES patients and 30 healthy controls. Participants underwent MRI scanning to measure frontal and cerebellar lobe volumes using the volBrain platform. Additionally, FES patients were assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic (MoCA-B), and Brief Motor Scale (BMS). Pearson's correlation, independent sample t-tests, multivariate linear regression, and binomial logistic regression were used to analyze the relationships between brain volumes, clinical assessments, and socio-demographic factors. Results No significant differences in frontal volumes were found between the two groups, while cerebellar volumes were significantly smaller in FES patients (p=0.004), particularly in younger males (p=0.026). Frontal volumes were negatively correlated with age in both groups (p=0.012), which remained robust in patients even after controlling for their gender, education, and DUI (p=0.012, aR2=0.221). Cerebellar volume reduction was associated with a higher likelihood of being classified as a patient (p=0.029). BMS was significantly correlated with frontal lobe volumes, especially in motor sequencing (MoSe), after adjusting for age, gender, and education (p=0.009). BMS MoSe scores were also significantly positively correlated with the DUI (r=0.415, p=0.023) and PANSS-General Psychopathology (GP) (r=0.494, p=0.005). MoCA-B scores were significantly lower in females than males (p=0.016), while PANSS-GP was significantly negatively correlated with age (r=-0.432, p=0.017). Conclusion Frontal and cerebellar volumes were differentially impacted in FES, with cerebellar atrophy being a significant distinguishing feature of the disorder. Frontal atrophy was associated with motor dysfunction but did not appear to influence psychopathology or cognition significantly in the early stages. The independent effects of frontal and cerebellar volumes, as shown by the lack of correlation between them, may suggest that these brain regions undergo separate pathological processes in schizophrenia, with frontal functional changes impacting motor function and cerebellar structural changes contributing to broader psychiatric symptoms, thereby warranting further exploration involving larger sample size.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».