Benefit and usability of a senior tablet and an emergency smartwatch for older adults and their relatives: Results from a prospective user study
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction Assistive technologies (ATs) have the potential to promote quality of life and independent living of older adults but also to relieve the burden of caregivers and relatives.However, evidence on effectiveness of ATs in the real-world application remains scarce.We conducted a prospective, exploratory user study to test the perceived benefit and satisfaction with different ATs in the real-world environment.Methods Community-dwelling adults aged 65 and their relatives tested either a tablet with a simplified interface or a smartwatch with programmable emergency contacts for eight weeks in their everyday life.Benefits and usability of AT were assessed by all older adults and their relatives using different assessment tools employed prior to and/or after the intervention.Outcome measures included the Technology Usage Inventory, Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM).Results 17 older adults and 16 relatives were included.Participants in the smartwatch group were slightly frailer and more dependent and reported non-significantly higher technology acceptance and satisfaction scores than those of the tablet group (P>.05).Relatives had significantly higher ratings on the item intention to use than older adults in the tablet group (t=3.3,P=.006).Identified everyday issues with the COPM included contact/communication and entertainment/information for the tablet, safety and getting help in emergency situations for the smartwatch, and AT usability for both devices.In the smartwatch group, performance (t=3.5, P=.008) and satisfaction (t=3.2,P=.01) in these domains improved significantly, whereas changes experienced by the tablet group were not statistically significant (all P>.05).Conclusions This study highlights remaining obstacles for a widespread and effective application of ATs in everyday life of older adults and their relatives.While the results do not provide evidence for a positive effect regarding communication deficits, benefits could be shown for the area of safety.To enhance the acceptance and impact of ATs, it is essential to consider the preferences, challenges, and objectives of not only frail older adults but also their relatives and caregivers during the technological design process.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle