Risk of Incident Atrial Fibrillation in Women with a History of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality and are associated with acute cardiac events in the peripartum period, as well as cardiovascular disease (CVD) later in life. Despite the robust association between hypertension and atrial fibrillation (AFib), comparatively little is known about HDP and individual HDP subtypes as sex-specific risk factors for AFib. Methods A population-based retrospective cohort study of 771,521 nulliparous women discharged for obstetrical delivery of their first live or stillborn singleton infant between 2002-2017 in Ontario, Canada. Data were obtained from record-level, coded, and linked population-based administrative databases housed at ICES. Using competing risks Cox proportional hazards regression, we estimated crude and multivariable-adjusted cause- specific hazard ratios (csHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between history of any HDP–and its six subtypes–and AFib before death, as well as all- cause mortality without a prior AFib diagnosis. Results Approximately 8% of subjects were diagnosed with HDP during the 16-year exposure accrual period. The total person-time of follow-up was 7,380,304 person-years, during which there were 2,483 (0.3%) incident AFib diagnoses and 2,951 (0.4%) deaths. History of any HDP was associated with an increased csHazard of both incident AFib and death without a prior AFib diagnosis [adjusted csHRs (95% CIs): 1.45 (1.28-1.64) and 1.31 (1.16-1.47), respectively]. These associations were observed in relatively young women (median time-to-event: 7 years postpartum). Associations suggestive of a ‘dose-response’ relationship were also observed, whereby both HDP severity, and presence of pre-pregnancy chronic hypertension, were associated with higher rates of both outcomes. Conclusions People exposed to HDP in their first delivery have a significantly increased csHazard of incident AFib compared to their unexposed counterparts, with higher rates observed in subjects exposed to more severe de novo HDP diagnoses as well as chronic hypertension in pregnancy. Given the substantial morbidity and mortality burden of AFib in women, these findings underscore the critical importance of considering history of HDP in risk calculation/stratification for both arrhythmic and non-arrhythmic CVDs; improving population-based surveillance of traditional and female-specific CVD risk factors; and developing targeted prevention strategies aimed at reducing the occurrence and burden of HDP. Clinical Perspective What is new? In this population-based retrospective cohort study of 771,521 nulliparous women, a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) significantly increased the cause-specific hazard of incident atrial fibrillation (AFib) compared to women without HDP, even after adjustment for confounders, and this association was observed in relatively young women (median follow-up: 7 years postpartum). Associations suggestive of a ‘dose-response’ relationships were observed, whereby subjects with more severe de novo HDP diagnoses, as well as those with pre-pregnancy chronic hypertension, had higher cause-specific rates of AFib, with the highest rate observed in subjects exposed to chronic hypertension in pregnancy. What are the clinical implications? These findings suggest that women with a history of any HDP–especially those with pre-pregnancy chronic hypertension–may benefit from closer monitoring for the early detection of AFib. Enhanced population-based surveillance of, and targeted strategies to prevent, HDP as a female-specific cardiovascular risk factor are needed to mitigate intermediate- and long-term cardiovascular disease risk associated with these adverse pregnancy conditions.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».