MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4403568842 · doi:10.1016/j.htct.2024.09.865

LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP FROM THE PHASE 1/2 MAJESTEC-1 TRIAL OF TECLISTAMAB IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED/REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA: SUBGROUP ANALYSIS BY LINES OF THERAPIES

2024· article· en· W4403568842 sur OpenAlex
Luciano J. Costa, N. W. van de Donk, Laura Rosiñol, Rakesh Popat, Be semer, Joaquín Martínez‐López, D Trancucci, Tara Stephenson, Katherine Chastain, NJ Bahlis

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueHematology Transfusion and Cell Therapy · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensInstitute of Cancer ResearchUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineSubgroup analysisRefractory (planetary science)Multiple myelomaInternal medicineTerm (time)OncologyMeta-analysis

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Teclistamab is the first approved B-cell maturation antigen × CD3 bispecific antibody (BsAb) for the treatment of triple-class exposed (TCE) relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), with weight-based dosing and the longest study follow-up of any BsAb in MM. In the pivotal phase 1/2 MajesTEC-1 study (NCT03145181/NCT04557098), teclistamab demonstrated rapid, deep, and durable responses (overall response rate [ORR], 63.0%; complete response or better [≥CR] rate, 46.1%; median duration of response [mDOR], 24 mo) and a low rate of discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs; 4.8%). This subgroup analysis of MajesTEC-1 reports the overall safety and efficacy of RRMM patients (pts) who received 2-3 prior lines of therapy vs. pts with 4 or more prior lines of therapies, with extended follow-up of 30 months. Pts received the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of teclistamab (1.5 mg/kg QW) and could switch to Q2W dosing if in partial response or better after ≥4 cycles of therapy (phase 1) or in ≥CR for ≥6 mo (phase 2). The primary endpoint was ORR (assessed per IMWG 2016 criteria). AEs were graded per CTCAE v4.03. CRS and ICANS were graded per ASTCT. Safety was reported in the overall population and efficacy was evaluated in pts who received 2-3 prior lines of therapy (≤3 LoT) vs. pts who received more than 3 prior lines of therapies (> 3 LoT). Of 165 pts who had received teclistamab as of Aug 2023, 26% (43/165) pts received ≤ 3 prior LoT and 74% (122/165) patients received > 3 prior LoT. Pts characteristics were similar between the groups, especially in terms of high-risk features. At 30.4 mo mFU, pts that received ≤3 prior LoT achieved an ORR of 74.4% with 60.5% of pts achieving ≥ CR [sCR 46.5% and CR 14%]. mPFS was 21.7 mo (95% CI, 13.8–NR), mDOR was 24.0 mo (95% CI, 14.0–NE) and median overall survival was not reached (95% CI, 18.3–NE). Pts who had > 3 prior LoT had an ORR of 59%, with 41% of pts achieving ≥CR [sCR 36.1% and CR 4.9%], mPFS was 9.7 mo (95% CI, 6.4–13.1), mDOR was 22.4 mo (95% CI, 14.9–NE) and median overall survival was 17.7 mo (95% CI, 12.2–29.7). In the overall population, hematologic AEs (any grade/grade 3/4) included neutropenia (72%/65%), anemia (55%/38%), thrombocytopenia (42%/23%), and lymphopenia (36%/35%). Infections occurred in 79% of pts (55% grade 3/4). Of grade 5 infections, 18/22 were due to COVID-19, reflecting study conduct during the COVID-19 pandemic. Onset of new grade ≥3 infections generally decreased over time, which aligned approximately with the median time of switch to Q2W dosing; other factors, such as increasing use of IVIG, may also contribute to this trend. AEs leading to dose reduction (n = 1) or discontinuation (n = 8; 5 due to infection) were infrequent. No new safety signals were reported. With the longest follow-up of any BsAb in MM, teclistamab continues to demonstrate deep and durable responses, especially in the subgroup of less heavily treated patients (≤3 prior LoT), which demonstrates even better PFS and complete response rates results than those patients in later lines of treatment (> 3 prior LOT). The safety profile of teclistamab remains consistent with that of BCMA-targeted bispecific therapies, with an important decrease in new onset of severe infections with time. This study was funded by Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,311
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,515

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,284
Écart entre enseignants0,268 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle