MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4403584286 · doi:10.18174/121481

Automated aggregation of geographic objects: A new approach to the conceptual generalisation of geographic databases

2003· dissertation· en· W4403584286 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
John van Smaalen

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGeographic Information Systems Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesRijkswaterstaat
Mots-clésComputer scienceDatabaseData scienceData miningInformation retrievalGeography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Automating the process of map generalisation has been a scientific challenge for over 30 years and still there is no comprehensive practical method.In this study I deal with the database part of the problem which has received relatively little attention in comparison with the total effort put into map generalisation research.This way I hope to contribute to a generic map generalisation system that should be possible before long, by combining the research results of the past few decades.This study was carried out during a few distinct periods.I first got involved in the subject of map generalisation in 1992 at the Canada Centre for Remote Sensing in Ottawa, where I assisted Dianne Richardson in implementing the method she had developed for her PhD research.A period that I look back upon with great pleasure.Subsequently, in 1994, I started a four-year PhD research project at Wageningen University, which was a followup of Dianne's work.It was during this time that I developed the concept of aggregation based on co-occurrence of classes.After this period the project came to a temporary standstill.Although I never lost the intention to finish it, it was only last year that I picked it up again and finished it, resulting in this dissertation.During these periods a number of people have been involved.I would like to thank Martien Molenaar for his patience when it might have seemed that I would not finish my study with a dissertation, for providing me with the conceptual framework for my study and for leaving me the freedom to find my own solutions.Arnold Bregt, who got involved in the project at a later stage, but still provided invaluable input and very practical comments when most needed.As during one meeting at ITC, when we solved the remaining issues in a very constructive 15-minute discussion.I would further like to thank all colleagues at the Surveying department (Landmeetkunde) for their collegiality and countless gezellige lunches at Unitas on Tuesdays when there were pannekoeken on the menu.Special thanks go to John Stuiver for introducing me to GIS in the first place and making me enthusiastic about its possibilities.Ren van der Schans for inspiring and animated discussions during the early stages of my study.Ron van Lammeren for all his help and enthusiasm.Elisabeth Addink, of course, for her wit and our collegial discussions, occasionally on the subject but most of the time diverting into the most ridiculous directions, which also made the time at Landmeetkunde memorable.Further thanks go to Kees Bol for salvaging files that I had accidentally deleted from the server and Prof. Kruidhof, founder of the Landmeetkunde laboratory, for providing us with such an exceptional place to work, overlooking the ever-changing sight of the river Rhine flood plains.Lots of thanks go to my parents, who have always encouraged me to study.Well mum, dad, this is about all I can do.And finally my girlfriend Ingrid for her love and support, as well as patiently answering people's questions whether I had finished my PhD yet.The goal of this study is to develop a framework and a working prototype for the generalisation of object-and vector-based categorical maps -such as large-scale topographic data -based on inter-object relationships.We strive for a system that is to a large extent automated and can be operated by non-expert users.Large-scale topographic maps are commonly object-based, categorical maps.The objects are classified: 'road', 'building' etc.The spatial inter-object relationships in large-scale datasets are often complicated.We will concentrate on the aggregation of objects belonging to distinct object classes, based on the spatial and thematic relationships

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,392
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,048
Tête enseignante GPT0,313
Écart entre enseignants0,264 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2003
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetGeographic Information Systems StudiesTravaux en français237 207