Innovative Technology Designed to Secure the Wellbore Stability Resulted in the Elimination of a Casing Section, Significantly Improvement of Rop and Drilling Fluid Saving, Avoiding Side-Track
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract This paper documents best practices and lessons learned from drilling Tertiary formations in one the field located onshore southeast Mexico, primarily in the Oligocene, Eocene, and Paleocene formations with extensive sandstone bodies interbedded with shales. These formations exhibit high permeability and potential for losses, compounded by overpressured sand bodies with high pressure and a significant risk of influx, adding complexity beyond initial expectations. This field, affected by compressive stresses and salt tectonics, consists of an anticline with its major axis trending NW-SE in the north and S-SW in the central and southern portions. Its NE end is bounded by a major NW-SE trending reverse fault, with a smaller reverse fault in the central and SE parts of the eastern flank. To the west, the reservoir shows natural closure dipping downward, delimited by the 7720 mvbnm contour, marking its conventional boundary. Inappropriately increasing density causes well issues, so reinforcing the wellbore wall is crucial to mitigate losses and create a "shielding" that allows the formation to withstand additional pressures, thereby increasing its operational window. The use of Wellbore Shielding technology (Ultra-Low Invasion) in the new field extension has proven ultra-resistant and flexible for real-time borehole reinforcement during drilling, enabling operations without compromising well integrity. Continuous Sand Bed Test (SBT) monitoring allows timely detection of unfavorable conditions and immediate response, as shown in the upcoming case study. The increase in the operating window has been made possible by Wellbore Shielding Technology, enabling necessary density steps without compromising drilling conditions despite high circulation loss rates. Real-time monitoring is essential for timely decision-making and optimal practices in response to well behavior. Accurate data on pore and fracture sizes is crucial for addressing initial problems directly, while materials for broad-spectrum mixtures at low and medium concentrations are key to successful hole reinforcement. Constant real-time monitoring of SBT tests ensures proper techniques for maintaining reinforcement systems. The inclusion of Wellbore Shielding Technology in well drilling has been driven by synergy, teamwork, lessons learned, and good practices. Unlike other materials, particles from Wellbore Shielding technology do not penetrate the formation, maintaining their size despite drilling forces. This minimizes the material needed for maintenance. Wellbore Shielding additives form flexible "shields" in the fluid system, creating an extremely low permeability barrier in the wellbore. Unlike conventional techniques, this barrier remains stable under high cutting forces and temperatures, resulting in ultra-low invasion across various permeabilities and microfractures up to 3,000 μm. Developed as an alternative to conventional techniques, WST technology creates an impermeable "shield" around mechanically weak, depleted, and fragile formations during drilling. The non-damaging shield is strong and flexible enough to withstand large pressure differentials, increasing the operational window and minimizing fluid losses.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».