06 Eating disorder toolkit 2023: Standards of practice in the primary care setting
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Throughout the COVID 19 pandemic, physicians across Canada began to see a 'shadow pandemic' unfold as new diagnosis of eating disorders and hospital admissions for patients with medically unstable eating disorders increased exponentially. As these rates remain high, specialists stressed the importance of the role primary care physicians play in the early recognition, assessment, and diagnosis of eating disorders as a way to improve prognosis. Further, the high volume of patients has resulted in the need to manage patients in the community or engage in collaborative care between the eating disorder specialist and primary care physician. This Eating Disorder Toolkit was created as a knowledge mobilization resource to provide primary care and community providers with Standards of Practice and improve care for eating disorder patients. Objectives 1. Provide an updated and easily readable evidence-based reference tool for PCPs 2. Clarify PCPs role in working with, monitoring, and treating EDs in a shared care model 3. Strive for early diagnosis and connection to care for improved prognosis and decreased morbidity 4. Highlight unique considerations for specific populations 5. Align with the upcoming Eating Disorders Pathway project Design/Methods The first edition of the ED Toolkit was reviewed and based on feedback sought and provided by key partners including PCPs already using the Toolkit, areas of improvement were identified. These included formatting to improve accessibility in the primary care setting, updating the guidelines, and including unique considerations for specific populations. A literature review of current guidelines and practices internationally was completed. Experienced paediatric and adult ED specialists reviewed the material to ensure it was appropriate for clinical practice. Key partners contacted for feedback and collaboration included the Provincial ED Steering Committee, Provincial ED Pathway Project Committee, UBC Continuing Professional Development, and Primary Care physicians. This ensured the resource was meeting PCPs identified needs and was usable in the primary care setting. Edits were made to reflect the feedback received. Finally, the resource was reviewed to ensure alignment with the upcoming Provincial ED Pathway Project. Results The Eating Disorder Toolkit 2023: Standards of Practice in the Primary Care Setting is now available and has been distributed widely across British Columbia. In addition, Kelty Mental Health and Compass, leading resource hubs in the province, host the live document on their sites. Finally, the toolkit is also provided to any health providers upon request to their regional ED clinic. While we have not formally studied the outcome of this resources, anecdotal reports via email and verbal feedback from nurse practitioners, paediatricians, and ED specialists across the province has been positive. Conclusion Eating disorders are complex illnesses associated with significant medical and psychiatric complications. Early recognition and management improves prognosis. Community providers play a crucial role in recognizing and managing these patients, however many do not have expertise in this area. It is hoped that this resource will support PCPs in managing ED patients in British Columbia and there may be a potential scope for use across Canada with adaptations to local guidelines and resources.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,114 | 0,228 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,006 | 0,013 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,023 | 0,016 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».