MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4403700310 · doi:10.3389/fendo.2024.1492448

Editorial: Prognostic factors in pituitary tumors: clinical, biochemical, imaging, and pathological aspects

2024· editorial· en· W4403700310 sur OpenAlexaff
Toru Tateno, R Stan, Stephanie Du Four

Notice bibliographique

RevueFrontiers in Endocrinology · 2024
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPathologicalPituitary tumorsMedicinePathologyBioinformaticsInternal medicineCancer researchOncologyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Pituitary tumors, affecting nearly 17 percent of the population, carry substantial implications (1).While functional pituitary tumors can be effectively monitored for recurrence using hormonal biomarkers, the absence of an equivalent parameter for predicting recurrence in non-functional pituitary tumors results in delayed recognition and subsequent management. Additionally, there remains limited data regarding the risk of complications following transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumors. Consequently, there exists a critical need to identify prognostic biomarkers that can serve as surveillance tools for patients and potential therapeutic targets. The recognition of prognostic factors in pituitary tumors holds significant promise for tailoring personalized therapeutic approaches. By doing so, we can enhance treatment success rates, improve survival outcomes, and elevate overall quality of life for affected patients. This research topic comprises three original research articles, one case report with a literature review, and one comprehensive review, all aimed at advancing our understanding of prognostic factors in pituitary tumors. One subtype of aggressive pituitary tumors is the plurihormonal Pit1-lineage pituitary tumor (2)(3)(4). However, due to its rarity, clinical features associated with GH/TSH-cosecreting pituitary tumors remain scarce. Consequently, managing this specific tumor type poses significant challenges. Yu et al retrospectively reviewed 12 GH/TSH-cosecreting pituitary tumor from 2063 patients diagnosed with GH-secreting pituitary tumors (5). GH/TSH-cosecreting pituitary tumors are more aggressive and resistant to therapies. Also, higher occurrence rates of complications, such as arrhythmia, heart enlargement, and osteoporosis/osteopenia, were seen in GH/TSHcosecreting pituitary tumors than GH-secreting pituitary tumors clinical features of GH/TSHcosecreting pituitary tumors.Regarding aggressive prolactinomas, they show resistance to multimodal therapies (6). Read et al. reported a case with aggressive prolactinoma treated with a potent and selective multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, pazopanib with a literature review regarding potential biomarkers for aggressive prolactinomas (7). The literature review suggests potential risk factors for aggressive prolactinomas, including genetic and epigenetic changes as well as receptor expression profiles. The article shed the light into the pathological molecular findings in aggressive pituitary tumors, which ca be candidate molecules for personalized medicine in the future.Bioinformatics is an integral discipline in cancer research that utilizes advanced computational strategies to decipher complex biological data sets. This approach will facilitate advances in precision medicine by greatly increasing our understanding of the molecular complexities underlying cancer and facilitating the design of treatments tailored to an individual's genetic makeup. Chen et al conducted a bioinformatics analysis using the Gene Expression Omnibus database, which revealed the correlation between the expression of basement membrane genes, including SPARCL1, GPC3, LAMA1, SDC4, GPC4, ADAMTS8, LAMA2, LAMC3, SMOC1, LUM and THBS2 genes, and immune infiltration (8). Based on the findings, a novel risk model, which predicts the invasiveness of pituitary tumors, has been proposed. These findings may lead to close surveillance of patients with pituitary tumors which have high risk of aggressive features.One of the complications of transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumors is cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. The incidence of CSF leakage has been reported between 0.5%-15.0% (9)(10)(11). Another complication of post transsphenoidal surgery is hyponatremia with incidence between 6.3% and 23. 4%, which may be symptomatic or asymptomatic. Previous studies suggested risk factors of hyponatremia after transsphenoidal surgery, however, they have been still debatable.Lin et al reported a new nomogram based on the multivariable model of risk factors, such as findings regarding pituitary stalk and diaphragm sellae on MRI scan, postoperative diabetes insipidus, blood sodium levels on the second day after surgery, to predict the risk of delayed hyponatremia after transsphenoidal surgery (13). The novel nomogram achieved an AUC of 0.849, which can be used by neurosurgeons in a clinical setting to provide more accurate predictions of delayed hyponatremia after transsphenoidal surgery in patients with pituitary tumors.Collectively, the articles featured in this research topic contribute novel evidence regarding prognostic factors in patients with pituitary tumors. Through comprehensive analyses of clinical, radiological, pathological, molecular, and bioinformatic data, these studies identify innovative prognostic markers. These markers hold promise for predicting both the prognosis of pituitary tumors and complications associated with transsphenoidal surgery, ultimately benefiting patients.However, further studies are necessary to validate these findings.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,023

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,010
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0040,002
Bibliométrie0,0030,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0030,003
Science ouverte0,0030,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0060,007
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,301
Écart entre enseignants0,289 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFrontiers in EndocrinologyMême sujetPituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207