S2260 Efficacy and Safety of LatiglutinaseIn Celiac Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Celiac disease is a chronic immune disorder triggered by dietary gluten, leading to mucosal inflammation in genetically predisposed individuals. Despite adherence to a gluten-free diet (GFD), many patients experience persistent symptoms and mucosal damage, prompting the exploration of non-dietary therapeutic approaches like latiglutenase. Latiglutenase is an enzyme therapy designed to degrade gluten proteins into non-immunogenic fragments, potentially reducing gut mucosa inflammation. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of latiglutenase in treating celiac disease. Methods: A systematic review of major databases, including Cochrane, SCOPUS, PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE till April 2024 was conducted, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing latiglutenase to placebo in celiac disease patients were included. Risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the DerSimonian–Laird method. Primary outcomes were the villus height to crypt depth ratio and intraepithelial lymphocyte densities; secondary outcomes included adverse events (AEs). Results: Three RCTs involving 253 patients were analyzed (Table 1). No significant difference was observed between latiglutenase and placebo in the villus height to crypt depth ratio (MD: 0.05, 95% CI [-0.41, 0.51], P = 0.82) (Figure 1A) or intraepithelial lymphocyte densities (MD: -11.82, 95% CI [-28.41, 4.78], P = 0.16) (Figure 1B). Additionally, there were no significant differences in overall AEs (RR: 0.99, 95% CI [0.81, 1.21], P = 0.90), medication-related AEs (RR: 1.33, 95% CI [0.71, 2.49], P = 0.37), or gastrointestinal-related AEs (RR: 1.05, 95% CI [0.82, 1.34], P = 0.70) (Figure 1C). Specific symptoms like diarrhea, nausea, headache, fatigue/tiredness, and abdominal distension did not differ between groups. Stratified by severity, both latiglutenase and placebo displayed comparable outcomes for mild, moderate, and severe AEs. Conclusion: While no significant differences were found in symptomatic, histological, and serological parameters between latiglutenase and placebo groups, previous trials indicated symptom improvements. This suggests that histological and serological parameters may require more time to normalize compared to symptomatic improvements. Longer-term RCTs are essential to comprehensively evaluate latiglutenase's effects on symptomatic, histological, and serological outcomes, along with its long-term safety profile.Figure 1.: Forest plot for A) Change in ratio of villus height to crypt ratio B) Change in densities of intraepithelial lymphocytes C) Any adverse events. Table 1. - Characteristics of participants in includedrandomized control trials Study ID Study Design Countries/center Total Participants Primary Outcome Inclusion Criteria Patients included in analysis Mean Age (SD) Latiglutinase group Placebo Latiglutinase group Placebo 1 Murray 2022 Phase 2, Randomized, double-blind, single-centre, placebo-controlled, USA/One center 50 Change in the ratio of villus height to crypt depth Adult patients (18–80 years), biopsy-confirmed CeD; to be following a GFD for longer than 1 year; and to have histologically well controlled disease, as evidenced by a measured ratio of villus height (Vh) to crypt depth (Cd) of 2.0 26 24 42.7 (10.88) 45.0 (13.88) 2 Murray 2017 Phase 2, randomized, double-blinded, Multicenter, placebo-controlled, USA, Canada, Finland, Norway, Ireland, and the UK 494 change in the villous height: crypt depth ratio Adult outpatients (age, 18–80 y) were required to have physician-diagnosed celiac disease, following a GFD for 1 year or more, and self-report at least 1 gastrointestinal symptom as moderate or severe during the 28 days before screening. 37 125 48.5 (12.90) 50.6 (13.59) 3 Lähdeaho 2014 Phase 2, Randomized, Multicenter, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study Finland/ 3 centers 41 The ratio of villus height to crypt depth and densities of intraepithelial lymphocytes Celiac disease diagnosis established by duodenal mucosal biopsy, attempted adherence to a GFD for 1 year or more, and being in clinical remission (ie, TG2-IgA negative and reporting minimal to no gluten-associated symptoms). 20 21 51.5 (10) 47.5 (13)
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,013 | 0,030 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,018 | 0,032 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,006 | 0,007 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».