S1330 Effects of Mirikizumab and Ustekinumab on Histologic Inflammation Evaluated by Comprehensive Assessment in 5 Intestinal Segments in a Randomized Controlled Phase 3 Trial of Participants With Crohn’s Disease
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Responsiveness of histologic inflammation and of combined endoscopic-histologic endpoints to treatment are evolving measures of disease activity in Crohn’s Disease (CD). Mirikizumab (MIRI) increased histologic response (H-Res) and remission (H-Rem) relative to placebo in the Phase 2 SERENITY trial. Methods: This study evaluated the impact of MIRI and ustekinumab (USTE) on H-Res and H-Rem and combined endoscopic-histologic response (EH-Res) and remission (EH-Rem) in all patients (pts), pts with prior biologic failure (BF), pts without prior BF in moderately to severely active CD, in the randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, treat-through Phase 3 VIVID-1 trial. Two biopsy specimens from each of 5 intestinal segments (1 ileal and 4 colonic) were obtained from the edge of the ulcers, or the most inflamed mucosa from randomized pts at screening, and weeks (W)12, and 52. Criteria for H-Res: absence of epithelial neutrophils and epithelial damage, erosions and ulceration or ≥50% decrease in either the active Robarts Histopathology Index or the active Global Histologic Disease Activity Score. H-Rem: complete absence of mucosal neutrophils (in epithelium and lamina propria), and no epithelial damage, erosions and ulcers; these criteria had to be met in all biopsy specimens. Endoscopic response: ≥50% improvement from baseline in Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD). Endoscopic remission: SES-CD total score ≤4 and ≥2-point reduction from baseline and no subscore >1 in any individual variable. Results: At W52, nominally significant differences between MIRI and USTE were observed in achieving H-Res in all pts (P =.007) and in BF pts (P =.006). For EH-Res, differences of MIRI vs USTE were numerically greater but not statistically significant in all pts (P =.063) but were nominally significant among BF pts (P =.023). While numerical differences between MIRI and USTE were observed in H-Rem and EH-Rem in all pts (H-Rem: P =.685; EH-Rem: P =.363) and in BF pts (H-Rem: P =.365; EH-Rem: P =.237), no significant differences were observed in these endpoints (Table 1). Conclusion: Using strict definitions, all histology-based endpoints were achieved by MIRI vs PBO. For comparison vs USTE, MIRI also showed nominal statistical difference for H-Res, which was prespecified and is considered the most sensitive to change, particularly driven by BF pts. The implication of these results on clinical endpoints and long-term outcomes, including hospitalization rates and surgeries, requires further evaluation. Table 1. - Impact of Mirikizumab and Ustekinumab on Histologic Response, Histologic Remission and Combined Endoscopic-Histologic Response and Remission MIRI USTE P Difference (95%CI) Histologic Response (%) All patients 58.2 48.8 0.007 9.6 (2.6, 16.6) Without prior biologic failure 61.9 56.9 0.383 5.0 (-5.3, 15.3) With prior biologic failure 56.5 41.3 0.006 15.2 (4.7, 25.7) Endoscopic-Histologic Response (%) All active patients 41.1 34.4 0.063 6.8 (-0.3, 14.0) Without prior biologic failure 42.5 40.8 0.829 1.7 (-8.6, 12.0) With prior biologic failure 39.6 27.8 0.023 11.8 (2.0, 21.7) Histologic Remission (%) All active patients 30.2 28.9 0.685 1.3 (-5.0, 7.7) Without prior biologic failure 33.3 34.6 0.822 -1.3 (-11.2, 8.6) With prior biologic failure 24.3 19.8 0.365 4.5 (-4.3, 13.2) Endoscopic-Histologic Remission (%, 95% CI) All active patients 17.2 14.8 0.363 2.6 (-2.8, 7.9) Without prior biologic failure 20.9 20.8 >0.999 0.1 (-8.4, 8.6) With prior biologic failure 13.3 8.7 0.237 4.6 (-1.9, 11.1) All active patients are patients with active histologic disease at baseline. Histologic response and histologic remission in all patients were prespecified, non-multiplicity-controlled endpoints. All analyses in patients without prior biologic failure, patients with biologic failure and combined endoscopic-histologic response and remission were analyzed post hoc. For achieving histologic response, the sum of 5 segments active RHI or active GHAS needed to be reduced by ≥50% from baseline.CI=confidence interval; GHAS=Global Histologic Disease Activity Score; MIRI=mirikizumab; RHI=Robarts Histopathology Index; USTE=ustekinumab.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».