S932 Outcomes of Endoscopic Procedures in Patients With High-Risk Cardio-Pulmonary Disease: A Population-Based Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: High-risk cardiopulmonary disease including heart failure [HF] and pulmonary hypertension, [PH] are associated with high inpatient mortality and morbidity. Endoscopic procedures including EGD, colonoscopy and ERCP are generally well tolerated. However, outcomes in patients with cardiopulmonary disease have not been thoroughly studied at a population-level. We aim to evaluate the safety outcomes among patients undergoing common inpatient gastrointestinal procedures. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample database, 2016-2021 was used to extract patients who underwent EGD, colonoscopy or ERCP. Patients with HF and PH undergoing above endoscopic procedures were identified. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, prolonged length of stay, and mechanical ventilation. Regression analyses were used to compare outcomes. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 81,725 HF and PH patients who underwent endoscopic intervention were identified. There was a higher proportion of females (55%, P< 0.001). Patients with HF and PH who underwent EGD had higher rates of inpatient mortality (aOR 1.106, CI 1.01-1.22; P=0.043), cardiac arrest (aOR 1.367, CI 1.18-1.57, P=0.019), cardiogenic shock (aOR 12.426, CI 10.68-4.45, P< 0.001) and prolonged length of stay (aOR 1.610 CI 1.54-1.68, P< 0.001) but similar rate of mechanical ventilation). Similarly, in patients who underwent colonoscopy, patients with HF and PH had higher rates of cardiac arrest (aOR 1.80 CI 1.42-2.27, P=0.036); cardiogenic shock (aOR 24.83 CI 19.05-32.37, P< 0.001) and prolonged length of stay (aOR 1.64, CI 1.55-1.74, P< 0.001) but similar mortality and mechanical ventilation. In contrast, there was no difference in outcomes among the 2 groups of patients who underwent ERCP. With all procedures combined, patients with high-risk cardiopulmonary disease had higher rate of mortality, cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock and prolonged length of stay but similar mechanical ventilation rates (Table 1). Conclusion: EGD is associated with increased risk of mortality among patients with high-risk cardiopulmonary disease while colonoscopy and ERCP did not increase risk of death. Odds of cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock and prolonged length of stay were higher among patients receiving EGD and colonoscopy. However, these negative outcomes were not observed in patients undergoing ERCP. Table 1. - Safety outcomes of endoscopic procedures in patients undergoing EGD, colonoscopy and ERCP aOR (95% CI) P-value Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Mortality 1.106 (1.01-1.22) 0.043 Cardiac Arrest 1.367 (1.18-1.57) 0.019 Cardiogenic shock 12.426 (10.68-4.45) <0.001 Prolonged length of Stay 1.610 (1.54-1.68) <0.001 Mechanical ventilation 1.036 (0.96-1.11) 0.234 Colonoscopy Mortality 1.15 (0.98-1.35) 0.583 Cardiac Arrest 1.80 (1.42-2.27) 0.036 Cardiogenic Shock 24.83 (19.05-32.37) <0.001 Prolonged length of stay 1.64 (1.55-1.74) <0.001 Mechanical ventilation 1.11 (0.98-1.26) 0.264 Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Mortality 1.766 (0.82-3.79) 0.380 Cardiac Arrest 2.967 (0.89-9.87) 0.524 Cardiogenic shock 9.283 (1.81-47.53) 0.224 Prolonged length of stay 1.615 (1.04-2.50) 0.132 Mechanical ventilation 1.977 (1.04-3.77) 0.694 Combined EGD, colonoscopy and ERCP Mortality 1.122 (1.03-1.22) 0.030 Cardiac arrest 1.405 (1.23-1.60) 0.008 Cardiogenic shock 15.892 (13.79-18.31) <0.001 Prolonged length of stay 1.607 (1.55-1.67) <0.001 Mechanical ventilation 1.049 (0.98-1.12) 0.103
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».