Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The group of Dubăsari burial mounds was studied by an expedition led by N.A. Chetraru (1931-2011) over seven field seasons between 1980-1983 and 1985-1987. This group comprised two large clusters: the southwestern cluster (I), situated between Pohrebea and Dubăsari, and the northeastern cluster (II), located between Goianul Nou and Crasnîi Vinogradari, as well as four isolated mounds. In total, 38 mounds containing 139 burials were excavated during the 1980s, with the largest number of burials (18) attributed to the Scythian period, dating from the late 6th to the 4th centuries BC. The Dubăsari mounds gained widespread attention due to the Scythian complexes unearthed, which included not only gold jewelry but also Greek amphorae, Attic pottery, a Scythian stone sculpture, and a bronze cauldron. Barrow 5 was particularly notable; alongside the 814-gram gold torque of Greek origin, other significant finds included a silver horse harness ornament of Thracian origin, an Attic black-glazed kantharos, and fragments of a red- figure krater. Based on amphora fragments associated with the funeral feast, Barrow 5 can be dated to the early second quarter of the 4th century BC. At least two distinct phases can be identified in the development of the Dubăsari burial ground, with a significant gap between them. The earliest mounds (43 and 46), located in the northeast, date back to the first third of the 5th century BC, or possibly even the second half of the 6th century BC. The second phase of the burial ground, dating to the first quarter of the 4th century BC, includes barrows 45, 20, and possibly 47. The largest number of Scythian mounds and burials is linked to the second quarter of the 4th century BC, concentrated in the southwestern part of the burial ground. This phase includes barrows 13, 18, 21, and 5. According to planigraphy, seven simultaneous mounds (12-16, 51, and 52) were found surrounding Barrow 5. These mounds had no documented burials but showed evidence of burned wooden structures, suggesting that they may have served a memorial rather than a funerary purpose, likely in connection with Barrow 5, which was the dominant feature in the landscape.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».