MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4403764316 · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1505361

Editorial: Educational approaches for promoting neurodivergent health, well-being, and thriving across the life course

2024· editorial· en· W4403764316 sur OpenAlexaff
Emily Hotez, Heather M. Brown, Lindsay Shea

Notice bibliographique

RevueFrontiers in Education · 2024
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEducational Leadership and Innovation
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesHealth Resources and Services AdministrationU.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Mots-clésThrivingLife course approachCourse (navigation)Computer scienceEngineering ethicsPsychologyMedical educationEngineeringSociologyMedicineSocial scienceDevelopmental psychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This Research Topic is comprised of eight innovative research articles that offer important contributions to the field. These contributions align with broader efforts to rupture siloes between education and health disciplines for those with disabilities and adopt a neurodiversity-oriented lens. Many of these articles reflect collaborations across neurotypes, prioritize lived experience as an essential form of expertise and knowledge, and are in service of the primary goal of the neurodiversity movement: to support the quality of life, health, well-being, and thriving of neurodivergent people. Importantly, these articles span the life course, with articles focusing on childhood, adolescence, and emerging adulthood.The intersection between health and education is perhaps most clearly illustrated in the Rizk (2023) article. The authors utilized the National Survey of Children's Health to test the association between current educational service use and six medical home primary care components. In light of their findings, the authors called for greater coordination between these systems and generated recommendations to advance this goal. The authors' utilization of a large and robust dataset increases the impact and generalizability of these findings.Several of the articles presented in this Research Topic shed light on the overlapping health and education needs, experiences, and perspectives of autistic college students-a rapidly increasing yet underserved population. First, Nelson et al. ( 2023) published a scoping review of 156 international studies that aimed to identify, map, and characterize literature that enumerates and describes supports for autistic post-secondary students. This review noted that college campuses lack support regarding communication, vocational, financial, and sexual health. This review also highlighted important next steps for higher education institutions, including bolstering access to services and individualized supports, addressing stigma, enhancing interpersonal connections on college campuses, and diversifying the accommodations offered. Second, a needs assessment study with undergraduate students from Hotez et al. ( 2023) further emphasized the ongoing need to address stigma towards neurodivergent people in post-secondary environments, despite increased awareness and acceptance of neurodivergence on college campuses.Two additional articles centered their analyses on the intersections of health and education earlier in development, with a focus on adolescence and youth. Gillespie-Lynch et al. ( 2023) describes a participatory approach to iteratively adapting a game design workshop to empower autistic youth and promote self-determination-a key developmental capacity for neurodivergent individuals in both education and healthcare. In addition to highlighting the utility of interest-based informal learning supports, this research highlighted the value of utilizing multi-modal assessment strategies in evaluating these and other neurodiversity-aligned intervention programs. Other articles in this Research Topic further support the utility of tailored educational approaches and their implications health and well-being. As an example, Pugatch et al. (2024) examined the engagement of adolescents with ADHD in a narrative-centered game-based program to prevent and address substance use in this population.A critical component of health and education programs is cultural relevance. Indeed, many of the studies highlight the importance of tailored and individualized approaches that address the intersection of other identities and statuses with neurodivergence. Taken together, this Research Topic highlights the importance of developing, implementing, and evaluating services, supports, and programs for neurodivergent individuals, particularly during key developmental periods. These supports should be individualized and tailored utilizing community engagement and participatory methods. Ideally, such supports would address intersectionality, cultural factors, and systemic barriers to health, well-being, and thriving in both health and educational settings. Assessment approaches that deploy multiple modalities can ensure more inclusive studies that reflect a more diverse sample of neurodivergent individuals. We look forward to witnessing the advancement of the research, clinical practice, and education recommended in this Research Topic.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,016
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,052

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,037
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0050,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0040,004
Bibliométrie0,0050,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,003
Communication savante0,0080,005
Science ouverte0,0050,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0160,015
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0160,010

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,350
Écart entre enseignants0,325 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFrontiers in EducationMême sujetEducational Leadership and InnovationTravaux en français237 207