The bacterial strains JAM1<sup>T</sup> and GP59 of the species <i>Methylophaga nitratireducenticrescens</i> differ in their expression profiles of denitrification genes in oxic and anoxic cultures
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background Strain JAM1 T and strain GP59 of the methylotrophic, bacterial species Methylophaga nitratireducenticrescens were isolated from a microbial community of the biofilm that developed in a fluidized-bed, methanol-fed, marine denitrification system. Despite of their common origin, both strains showed distinct physiological characters towards the dynamics of nitrate (${\mathrm{NO}}_{3}^{-}$) reduction. Strain JAM1 T can reduce ${\mathrm{NO}}_{3}^{-}$ to nitrite (${\mathrm{NO}}_{2}^{-}$) but not ${\mathrm{NO}}_{2}^{-}$ to nitric oxide (NO) as it lacks a NO-forming ${\mathrm{NO}}_{2}^{-}$ reductase. Strain GP59 on the other hand can carry the complete reduction of ${\mathrm{NO}}_{3}^{-}$ to N 2 . Strain GP59 cultured under anoxic conditions shows a 24-48h lag phase before ${\mathrm{NO}}_{3}^{-}$ reduction occurs. In strain JAM1 T cultures, ${\mathrm{NO}}_{3}^{-}$ reduction begins immediately with accumulation of ${\mathrm{NO}}_{2}^{-}$. Furthermore, ${\mathrm{NO}}_{3}^{-}$ is reduced under oxic conditions in strain JAM1 T cultures, which does not appear in strain GP59 cultures. These distinct characters suggest differences in the regulation pathways impacting the expression of denitrification genes, and ultimately growth. Methods Both strains were cultured under oxic conditions either with or without ${\mathrm{NO}}_{3}^{-}$, or under anoxic conditions with ${\mathrm{NO}}_{3}^{-}$. Transcript levels of selected denitrification genes ( nar1 and nar2 encoding ${\mathrm{NO}}_{3}^{-}$ reductases, nirK encoding ${\mathrm{NO}}_{2}^{-}$ reductase, narK12f encoding ${\mathrm{NO}}_{3}^{-}$/${\mathrm{NO}}_{2}^{-}$transporter) and regulatory genes ( narXL and fnr ) were determined by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. We also derived the transcriptomes of these cultures and determined their relative gene expression profiles. Results The transcript levels of nar1 were very low in strain GP59 cultured under oxic conditions without ${\mathrm{NO}}_{3}^{-}$. These levels were 37 times higher in strain JAM1 T cultured under the same conditions, suggesting that Nar1 was expressed at sufficient levels in strain JAM1 T before the inoculation of the oxic and anoxic cultures to carry ${\mathrm{NO}}_{3}^{-}$ reduction with no lag phase. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that each strain had distinct relative gene expression profiles, and oxygen had high impact on these profiles. Among denitrification genes and regulatory genes, the nnrS3 gene encoding factor involved in NO-response function had its relative gene transcript levels 5 to 10 times higher in strain GP59 cultured under oxic conditions with ${\mathrm{NO}}_{3}^{-}$ than those in both strains cultured under oxic conditions without ${\mathrm{NO}}_{3}^{-}$. Since NnrS senses NO, these results suggest that strain GP59 reduced ${\mathrm{NO}}_{3}^{-}$ to NO under oxic conditions, but because of the oxic environment, NO is oxidized back to ${\mathrm{NO}}_{3}^{-}$ by flavohemoproteins (NO dioxygenase; Hmp), explaining why ${\mathrm{NO}}_{3}^{-}$ reduction is not observed in strain GP59 cultured under oxic conditions. Conclusions Understanding how these two strains manage the regulation of the denitrification pathway provided some clues on how they response to environmental changes in the original biofilm community, and, by extension, how this community adapts in providing efficient denitrifying activities.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».