Lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture: a secondary analysis of PRISMA cluster randomized trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Third-trimester lower uterine segment thickness (LUST) is associated with uterine rupture during trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) but threshold values vary according to the approach used (lower values with vaginal ultrasound, higher values with abdominal ultrasound). OBJECTIVE: To estimate the optimal LUST cut-off value combining vaginal and abdominal ultrasound to predict uterine rupture during TOLAC. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a secondary analysis of PRISMA cluster randomized trial including women with a single previous cesarean who underwent ultrasound LUST measurement at 34-38 weeks using the thinnest measurement obtained by combining transvaginal and transabdominal measurements. Participants in the intervention group were informed about the risk of uterine rupture according to LUST reported in 3 categories (≥2.5 mm: low risk-TOLAC is safe; 2.0-2.4 mm: intermediate-risk-TOLAC is safe under specific conditions (e.g., Grobman estimate of vaginal delivery of at or above 70% and/or having a history of vaginal delivery; estimated fetal weight below 4000 grams; interdelivery interval≥18 months); <2.0 mm: high-risk for uterine rupture). Delivery outcomes including uterine rupture were compared using nonparametric analyses and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Among 3460 participants, 2809 (81%); 385 (11%); and 266 (8%) were identified at low-; intermediate-; and high-risk for uterine rupture, respectively. As expected, low-risk participants were more likely to undergo TOLAC (49% vs 46% vs 13%; P=.001) and more likely to undergo labor induction (16% vs 12% vs 3%, respectively; P=.001) than intermediate-risk and high-risk participants. Four (0.3%) cases of uterine rupture during TOLAC occurred among 1382 low-risk participants but none among the intermediate-risk (0/178) and high-risk (0/35) participants (P=.73). Among low-risk participants, uterine rupture was associated with LUST combining vaginal and abdominal ultrasound (area under the ROC curve: 0.93; 95% confidence interval: 0.86%-0.99%; P=.001) with all cases occuring among women with LUST between 2.5 and 3.0 mm (4/371 or 1.1%) compared to none (0/1011) among those with LUST≥3.0 mm (P=.01). CONCLUSIONS: Third-trimester LUST measurement influences the rates of TOLAC and uterine rupture. TOLAC appears to be associated with a low risk of uterine rupture with a LUST between 2.0 and 2.4 mm under specific conditions. However, these conditions should perhaps be extended to patients with a LUST of less than 3.0 mm, as we found an increase in uterine ruptures in this subgroup (between 2.5 and 3.0 mm) who had no special conditions to comply with. LUST≥3.0 mm combining vaginal and abdominal ultrasound was associated with a very low risk for uterine rupture. A large-scale study using these new parameters would have the potential to demonstrate a reduction in uterine ruptures during TOLAC.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,009 | 0,008 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».