Electrophysiological Insights in Exergaming—Electroencephalography Data Recording and Movement Artifact Detection: Systematic Review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Exergames are interactive solutions that require physical activity and are commonly used in learning or rehabilitation settings. For cognitive rehabilitation with exergames, the assessment of the intervention progress can be conducted by verifying the changes in brain activity. Electroencephalography (EEG) is a well-known method for this evaluation. However, motion artifacts due to large body movements can impede signal quality. No comprehensive guide on the artifact removal methods in the context of exergaming has been found. OBJECTIVE: This paper aimed to identify studies that have assessed EEG signals while a user interacts with an exergame and the applied methods for data handling and analysis with a focus on dealing with movement artifacts. METHODS: This review included studies on human participants while engaging in exergames, where the primary outcome was brain activity measured by EEG. A total of 5 databases were searched at 3 time points: March 2021, October 2022, and February 2024. The Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies assessed methodological quality, rating studies as "good," "fair," or "poor." Data were synthesized quantitatively to identify characteristics across studies, including sample demographics and intervention details, and basic statistics (mean [SD]) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 494 papers were screened, resulting in 17 studies having been included. All studies carried out EEG recordings during exergame interactions, primarily assessing attention and concentration, with the alpha wave being the most analyzed EEG band. Common motion artifact removal methods included visual inspection and independent component analysis. The review identified significant risks of bias, with 2 studies rated as "good," 7 as "fair," and 8 as "poor." Due to the small number of studies and their heterogeneity, a meta-analysis was not feasible. CONCLUSIONS: The study successfully identifies the feasibility of recording electrophysiological brain activity during exergaming and provides insights into EEG devices, analysis methods, and exergaming systems used in previous studies. However, limitations, such as the lack of sufficient detail on motion artifact removal and a focus on short-term effects, underscore the need for improved methodologies and reporting standards, with recommendations for enhancing reliability in cognitive rehabilitation with exergames.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».