Feminism's Fight: Challenging Politics and Policies in Canada Since 1970 Barbara Cameron and Meg Luxton, eds. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2023, pp. 392. 10.59962/9780774868051
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Challenging Politics and Policies in Canada Since 1970 is a comprehensive work on the relationship between feminism, politics, and policies in Canada over the past five decades.Editors Barbara Cameron and Meg Luxton have assembled a thorough collection that explores the challenges, accomplishments, and ongoing struggles encountered by feminists and asks how new ways of organizing and engaging with federal government policy can advance the feminist agenda of social and economic equality.The chapters tell the story of how feminism has transformed and evolved, and how Canada's feminist movement has interacted with governments from the 1970s to 2020.At its core, this collection grapples with the role feminism has played in shaping Canadian politics and policies since the Royal Commission on the Status of Women in Canada (RCSW).One of the key strengths of the book is its diverse range of perspectives and topics covered.Part one of the book, "Challenging Dominant Paradigms," serves as a foundational framework for the subsequent discussions.Cameron and Luxton in chapter 1, deftly navigate through the complexities of the RCSW, providing a balanced critique that acknowledges its contributions while also highlighting its limitations.Their analysis sets the stage for a comprehensive examination of various facets of Canadian feminism, ranging from Indigenous decolonization to LGBTQ+ rights, underscoring the interconnectedness of feminist activism with broader societal transformations.In chapter 2, Shelagh Day and Pamela Palmater provide a powerful narrative on the long history of discrimination against Indigenous women in Canada, laying bare the systemic failures of the Canadian government in addressing these injustices.Part two, "Reclaiming the Economy," delves into the economic dimensions of feminism in Canada.Cameron's chapter on macroeconomic policy provides an accessible analysis of the interaction between the economy and feminism, offering balanced critiques of neoliberalism and highlighting the intersectional experiences of women across different social strata.Luxton's examination of socialist feminism further enriches the discourse, offering practical policy solutions for addressing entrenched gender inequalities in domestic labor, and Amber J. Fletcher discusses the history of Canadian farm women and presents actionable recommendations for equity.In part three, "Reimagining Policy," contributors analyze the ideas proposed by feminists and track the approaches adopted by governments in response.Lise Gotell scrutinizes the RCSW's gender-neutral liberal feminist approach while also recognizing its significant gains, and Christina Cabriel exposes the deficiencies of the RCSW in addressing immigration and citizenship issues.Alana Cattapan traces the evolution of reproductive freedom in Canada and how the concept of responsibility of governance over reproduction has evolved.Ann Porter discusses evolving obstacles to economic security for Canadian women since the RCSW.Part four, "Reframing Representation," challenges conventional notions of political representation.Alexandra Dobrowolsky exposes a recurring pattern of "strategic, cynical, and
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,012 | 0,013 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,015 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».