Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Our societies are built around waiting. At the bus stop, at the doctor's, in a store, in government offices, on the phone for help, this exercise in patience structures our lives. It is so prevalent that we forget that it affects us daily. Waiting is also unequal. The rich wait less than the poor: they see their requests granted immediately, while the latter defer their wants, often for a long time, sometimes indefinitely. It is a way of demonstrating that one person's time is more important than that of someone else who is being kept waiting; it is to wield power. And yet, even among the elite, it is sometimes necessary to wait. Achieving political power takes time, sometimes a lot of time. A recent study by Étienne Ollion (2021), which serves as the basis for this visual essay, showed that to become a Member of Parliament, it takes years, sometimes decades, of prior involvement in politics. Hence, the idea of representing the path to the top of the power pyramid as a long queue. The image is compelling. It is also a useful means for grasping a series of phenomena at play in politics. The existence of such a queue imposes a selection process that favors certain profiles and excludes others. Because they skew representation in favor of the upper classes, and because they also increase the discriminatory nature of the political field, waiting lines act as a filter. The essay describes the various stages at which the filter is imposed. It also has a homogenizing effect: because it socializes those who wait in it, the queue makes individuals more alike—in their ways of thinking, speaking, and even dressing. Toward the end of the essay, we see that individuals increasingly come to resemble one another. Finally, the queue individualizes: because it pits people against each other for the few available positions, it encourages self-serving strategies and betrayal. Thus, it is no surprise that they are over-represented at the summits of the Palais Bourbon (home to France's National Assembly). Conversely, members of the working classes, who represent half of the active population, are virtually absent at the top. In the Waiting Line is a visual essay that seeks to describe contemporary politics through the device of a queue. Through a stylized form it illustrates the various mechanisms that produce the homogeneous political class that governs us. The essay makes use of the format provided by .able to convey its process-driven nature, while deliberately emphasizing its stylized aspect. Based on politics, this study aims to draw attention to the everyday mechanisms that discreetly guide our practices. In the Waiting Line is produced using the scroll.able format, adapted to the highly interdisciplinary nature of the project. Indeed, visual art and design (Dimitri Charrel, Lorène Gaydon) are necessary for creating the dynamic means of representing these social organizations, which sociologist Étienne Ollion analyzed in his most recent book.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».