Seismic collapse risk assessment and fragility analysis of reinforced masonry core walls with boundary elements using the FEMA P695 methodology
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In the past, the primary objective of structural design codes was centred around ensuring human life safety, with a strong focus on preventing structural collapse. This approach predominantly relied on force- or strength-based criteria as the basis for design. Nevertheless, a notable shift has occurred recently, transitioning the design philosophy from 'strength' towards a 'performance'-based approach. This shift signifies a growing recognition that strength and performance are not identical. However, to adopt the performance-based seismic design approach, it is essential to develop precise models for estimating damage and potential losses associated with various seismic force-resisting systems (SFRSs). Fragility functions are widely interpreted among the most prevalent damage and loss models. They establish a crucial link between specific demand parameters and the likelihood of exceeding various damage states. Although reinforced masonry (RM) structures have recently gained popularity, the seismic design of mid- to high-rise RM structures is still challenging because it requires a reliable SFRS capable of providing the needed ductility and capacity. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to evaluate the key seismic performance parameters (i.e., system overstrength and ductility) and to perform a collapse capacity risk assessment of reinforced masonry core walls with boundary elements (RMCW+BEs) as the main SFRS in RM structures. The current study utilizes the applied element method (AEM) implemented in the Extreme Loading for Structures software (ELS) to model three RM structures with various heights (10-, 15-, and 20-story buildings). Nonlinear pseudo- static pushover analysis was performed to quantify the ductility and overstrength of the proposed RM system following the FEMA P695 guidelines. In addition, an incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) was carried out to assess the seismic collapse risk of RMCW+BEs by generating system-level-based fragility curves. The results showed that the proposed RM system provides the needed ductility, overstrength and deformation capacity for a ductile SFRS for typical mid- and high-rise RM buildings. Furthermore, the developed collapse fragility curves verified excellent seismic performance, negligible collapse probability values and high reserved collapse capacity at the maximum considered earthquake (MCE) design level. The findings of this study significantly contribute toward adopting RMCW+BEs as an effective SFRS for typical RM buildings in the next generations of North American masonry design standards. • Seismic collapse risk assessment and fragility analysis of RMCW+BEs are conducted using FEMA P695. • The AEM method is utilized to carry out risk assessment of RM buildings. • RMCW+BEs showed can maintain the needed system ductility and strength. • Incremental dynamic analysis is carried out for RM buildings with RMCW+BEs. • RMCW+BEs can be adequately used as an effective seismic force resisting system.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».