MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4404241043 · doi:10.1093/sumbio/qvae029

Microbial solutions must be deployed against climate catastrophe

2024· article· en· W4404241043 sur OpenAlexaff
Raquel S. Peixoto, Christian R. Voolstra, Lisa Y. Stein, Philip Hugenholtz, Joana Falcão Salles, Shady A. Amin, Max M. Häggblom, Ann Gregory, Thulani P. Makhalanyane, Fengping Wang, Nadège Adoukè Agbodjato, Yinzhao Wang, Nianzhi Jiao, Jay T. Lennon, António Ventosa, Patrik M. Bavoil, Virginia L. Miller, Jack A. Gilbert

Notice bibliographique

RevueSustainable Microbiology · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnergy
ThématiqueGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research
Établissements canadiensUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental resource managementRisk analysis (engineering)Environmental planningForensic engineeringComputer scienceBusinessEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This paper is a call to action. By publishing concurrently across journals like an emergency bulletin, we are not merely making a plea for awareness about climate change. Instead, we are demanding immediate, tangible steps that harness the power of microbiology and the expertise of researchers and policymakers to safeguard the planet for future generations. The climate crisis is escalating. A multitude of microbe-based solutions have been proposed (Table 1), and these technologies hold great promise and could be deployed along with other climate mitigation strategies. However, these solutions have not been deployed effectively at scale. To reverse this inaction, collaborators across different sectors are needed — from industry, funders and policymakers — to coordinate their widespread deployment with the goal of avoiding climate catastrophe. This collective call from joint scientific societies, institutions, editors and publishers, requests that the global community and governments take immediate and decisive emergency action, while also proposing a clear and effective framework for deploying these solutions at scale. Examples of microbial strategies that can be developed and/or deployed at scale to tackle climate change1–3,10 Examples of microbial strategies that can be developed and/or deployed at scale to tackle climate change1–3,10 Microorganisms have a pivotal but often overlooked role in the climate system1–3 — they drive the biogeochemical cycles of our planet, are responsible for the emission, capture and transformation of greenhouse gases, and control the fate of carbon in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. From humans to corals, most organisms rely on a microbiome that assists with nutrient acquisition, defence against pathogens and other functions. Climate change can shift this host–microbiome relationship from beneficial to harmful4. For example, ongoing global coral bleaching events, where symbiotic host–microbiome relationships are replaced by dysbiotic (that is, pathogenic) interactions (Fig. 1), and the consequent mass mortality mean the extinction of these ‘rainforests of the sea’ may be witnessed in this lifetime5. Specifically, a decline of 70–90% in coral reefs is expected with a global temperature rise of 1.5°C6. Although this example highlights how the microbiome is inextricably linked to climate problems, there is a wealth of evidence that microbes and the microbiome have untapped potential as viable climate solutions (Table 1). However, despite the promise of these approaches, they have yet to be embraced or deployed at scale in a safe and coordinated way that integrates the necessary but also feasible risk assessment and ethical considerations7. Corals and climate change. a–d, Examples of the same healthy (a,b), bleached (c) and dead (d) corals before (a,b) and after (c,d) being affected by heatwaves caused by climate change. Photos by Morgan Bennett-Smith. The multifaceted impacts of climate change on the environment, health and global economy demand a similar, if not more urgent and broad, mobilization of technologies as observed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic8,9. To facilitate the use of microbiome-based approaches and drawing from lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic9, we advocate for a decentralized yet globally coordinated strategy that cuts through bureaucratic red tape and considers local cultural and societal regulations, culture, expertise and needs. We are ready to work across sectors to deploy microbiome technologies at scale in the field. We also propose that a global science-based climate task force comprising representatives from scientific societies and institutions should be formed to facilitate the deployment of these microbiome technologies. We volunteer ourselves to spearhead this, but we need your help too. Such a task force would provide stakeholders such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) committee and United Nations COP conference organizers, and global governments access to rigorous, rapid response solutions. Accompanied by an evidence-based framework, the task force will enable pilot tests to validate and scale up solutions, apply for dedicated funding, facilitate cross-sector collaboration and streamlined regulatory processes while ensuring rigorous safety and risk assessments. The effectiveness of this framework will be evaluated by key performance indicators, assessing the scope and impact of mitigation strategies on carbon reduction, ecosystem restoration and enhancement of resilience in affected communities, aiming to provide a diverse and adaptable response to the urgent climate challenges faced today. We must ensure that science is at the forefront of the global response to the climate crisis. We encourage all relevant initiatives, governments and stakeholders to reach out to us at [email protected]. We are ready and willing to use our expertise, data, time and support for immediate action. We thank Morgan Bennett-Smith for support with the figure. This article has been co-published with permission in Sustainable Microbiology, The ISME Journal, mSystems, FEMS Microbiology Ecology, Nature Microbiology, Nature Reviews Microbiology, Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, Nature Communications, Communications Biology, Communications Earth and Environment, npj Biodiversity, npj Biofilms and Microbiomes, npj Climate Action and npj Sustainable Agriculture. All rights reserved. © The Authors, 2024. The articles are identical except for minor stylistic and spelling differences in keeping with each journal's style. Any citation can be used when citing this article. J.A.G. is a Scientific Advisory Board Member for Oath Inc. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,033
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,046
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,033
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,177

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0330,046
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,008
Communication savante0,0210,025
Science ouverte0,0030,014
Intégrité de la recherche0,0230,018
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0190,011

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,255
Écart entre enseignants0,242 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations7
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSustainable MicrobiologyMême sujetGlobal Energy and Sustainability ResearchTravaux en français237 207