MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4404248514 · doi:10.1002/jhm.13548

The <i>Journal of Hospital Medicine</i> turns 20

2024· article· he· W4404248514 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Samir S. Shah

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Hospital Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languehe
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueHealthcare Policy and Management
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Mots-clésMedicineHospital medicineMEDLINEAlternative medicineFamily medicinePathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

We are honored to lead the Journal of Hospital Medicine into its 20th year, continuing our commitment to publishing high-quality research and commentary that advance the field, influence policy, and improve patient care. Enhancing clinical knowledge also remains integral to our mission, hence the many forums to which our readers can avail themselves, including Clinical Progress Notes, Clinical Guideline Highlights for the Hospitalist, Things We Do For No Reason™, Clinical Care Conundrums, and, most recently, Visual Vignettes, a column focused on physical diagnosis. We have also adapted to and shaped new ways of consuming medical information as we build a community around the journal. Our redesigned website and active engagement by our expanded digital media team on a variety of platforms, including LinkedIn, X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, and Threads, allow readers to engage with us in ways that best meet their needs. Moreover, our pioneering editorial and digital media fellowship programs play a key role in developing academic leaders. Notably, our commitment extends beyond research and education to embracing the dynamic ways healthcare intersects with society. Thus, we have published research and perspectives on vulnerable populations, such as Veterans, LGBTQ+ individuals, the elderly, children, and incarcerated individuals, and perspectives on voting rights, climate change, reproductive rights, and gun violence, issues that inevitably affect our patients and colleagues. Healthcare, by its nature, intersects with policy and legislation. Decisions made by lawmakers—whether at the federal or state level—have a tangible effect on patient health. For example, changes to child labor laws in some states place some of our most vulnerable populations at risk of exploitation.1 Permissive gun laws in one state are associated not only with higher within state gun-related suicides and homicides but also with other states' firearm-related deaths.2 Decisions surrounding women's healthcare, including abortion access, contraception, and reproductive rights, are being made in statehouses across the country.3 The consequences of these decisions are not abstract: we see them in the lives of real people—in children and adolescents, like the more than 1200 killed in gun-related violence in 2024, and in women who experienced life-threatening septic abortions due to delayed care in restrictive states.4, 5 As healthcare providers, we are caregivers and advocates for our patients first and foremost. As a journal, our responsibility is to acknowledge and inform our readers about broader societal issues, including those shaped by political discourse, that directly influence our patients' health. The decisions those of us in healthcare make—from how to console grieving parents, counsel a pregnant woman whose fetus has chromosomal abnormalities, or navigate end-of-life care to how we incorporate decarbonization activities into our organizational processes—are intertwined with the sociopolitical context in which we practice. Consider the recent federal policy change to cap the monthly insulin prices for Medicare recipients at $35.6 For millions of Americans with diabetes, this is not simply a policy or political issue—it's a change that reverses lethal medication rationing due to high cost, giving them access to life-saving medication without fear of financial ruin. Similarly, policies that allow Medicare to negotiate drug prices, which would ease the financial burden on patients, illustrate how government decisions can directly affect health outcomes.7 Medicaid, in contrast to Medicare, is administered at the state level. This difference adds a layer of complexity as access to care, the quality of that care, and the protection of fundamental rights can vary significantly depending on local policy choices. Some may question whether a medical journal should address issues like these, but healthcare does not exist in a vacuum—it is shaped by laws, policies, and social dynamics. To ignore how these factors influence patient care, health, and well-being would be to overlook an essential aspect of our work as clinicians. We must acknowledge the realities that affect our patients' lives and advocate for improvements to their care. We see this approach as being true to the core mission of medicine, which societal factors have always influenced. Public health initiatives like clean water and vaccination programs arose from a need to address the broader determinants of health. The opioid epidemic cannot be understood without acknowledging its social, economic, and political underpinnings. Likewise, the effects of climate change on public health, racial disparities in healthcare, or access to reproductive care are issues that demand the attention of both policymakers and healthcare professionals. By providing a forum for scholarly dissemination and discussion of these broader determinants of health, we remain true to our mission. As we move into the next decade, we remain committed to advocating for our patients' health and well-being. Katherine A. Auger (Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, [email protected]); Jennifer Baird (Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, [email protected]); Anthony C. Breu (Harvard Medical School, [email protected]); Michelle N. Brooks (South Texas Veterans Health Care System, [email protected]); Daniel J. Brotman (Johns Hopkins University, [email protected]); Susan L. Calcaterra (University of Colorado, [email protected]); Paula Chatterjee (University of Pennsylvania, [email protected]); Alex J. Chinn (Lt. Col. Luke Weathers, Jr. VA Medical Center, [email protected]); Donna Coetzee (University of Minnesota, [email protected]); Stephanie K. Doupnik (Vanderbilt University, [email protected]); Lenny Feldman (Johns Hopkins University, [email protected]); Catherine Glatz (University of Rochester, [email protected]); Rachita Gupta (University of Colorado, [email protected]); Matthew Hall (Children's Hospital Association, [email protected]); Heather N. Hofmann (Loma Linda University, [email protected]); Keri Holmes-Maybank (Medical University of South Carolina, [email protected]); Molly Horstman (Baylor College of Medicine, [email protected]); Nathan Houchens (University of Michigan, [email protected]); Anand D. Jagannath (Oregon Health & Science University, [email protected]); Karen E. Jerardi (Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, [email protected]); Leah N. Jones (Children's Mercy Kansas City, [email protected]); Farah Acher Kaiksow (University of Wisconsin, [email protected]); Zahir Kanjee (Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, [email protected]); Michelle M. Kelly (University of Wisconsin, [email protected]); Benjamin Kinnear (University of Cincinnati, [email protected]); Elise P. Lu (University of Western Ontario, [email protected]); Sanjay Mahant (University of Toronto, [email protected]); Manpreet Malik (Emory University, [email protected]); Kimberly D. Manning (Emory University, [email protected]); Jessica L. Markham (Children's Mercy Kansas City, [email protected]); Stephanie K. Mueller (Brigham and Women's Hospital), Oanh Kieu Nguyen (University of California, San Francisco, [email protected]); Andrew P. J. Olson (University of Minnesota); Michael Osnard (Johns Hopkins University, [email protected]); Rachel J. Peterson (Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, [email protected]); Priya Prasad (University of California, San Francisco, [email protected]); Rehan Qayyum (Eastern Virginia Medical School, [email protected]); Jennifer Readlynn (University of Rochester, [email protected]); Gregory Ruhnke (University of Chicago, [email protected]); Maria Santos (Providence Cedars Sinai Tarzana Medical Center, [email protected]); Shamini Selvakumar (McMaster University, [email protected]); Suchita Shah Sata (Duke University, [email protected]); Jeffrey L. Schnipper (Brigham and Women's Hospital, [email protected]); Erin E. Shaughnessy (University of Alabama, Birmingham, [email protected]); Heidi J. Sucharew (University of Cincinnati, [email protected]); Maha Sulieman (Emory University, [email protected]); Stephanie Parks Taylor (University of Michigan, [email protected]); Michael Tchou (University of Colorado, [email protected]); Joseph S. Thomas (Buffalo Medical Group, [email protected]); Patricia Tran (University of Illinois, Peoria, [email protected]); Amanda J. Ullman (University of Queensland, [email protected]); Marie E. Wang (Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, [email protected]); Andrew White (University of Washington, [email protected]); Charlie M. Wray (University of California, San Francisco, [email protected]); Ali R. Yazdanyar (University of Pennsylvania, [email protected]). The author declares no conflict of interest.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,008
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,798
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0080,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,279
Écart entre enseignants0,256 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Hospital MedicineMême sujetHealthcare Policy and ManagementTravaux en français237 207